The neuro-prognostic value of the ion shift index in cardiac arrest patients following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

doi:10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.087

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The ion shift index (ISI) as a prognostic indicator that can show the severity of hypoxic-ischemic injury. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the ISI in predicting unfavorable neurological outcomes at hospital discharge in cardiac arrest (CA) patients following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and to compare its performance to other prognostic predictors.
METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study including adult CA patients treated with ECPR between January 2018 and December 2022 in a tertiary hospital. Data regarding clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters were collected from medical records. The ISI was determined based on the first available serum electrolyte levels after ECPR. The primary outcome was unfavorable neurological status at hospital discharge, defined as Cerebral Performance Categories 3-5. Comparisons of the characteristics between the two groups were made using the χ² test for categorical variables and the t-test or non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables, as appropriate. Correlation analysis was performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. A two-tailed P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Among the 122 patients involved, 46 (37.7%) had out-of-hospital CA, and 88 had unfavorable neurological outcomes. The ISI was significantly higher in the unfavorable outcome group than in the favorable outcome group (3.74 [3.15-4.57] vs. 2.69 [2.51-3.07], P<0.001). A higher ISI level was independently related to unfavorable outcome (odds ratio=6.529, 95% confidence interval 2.239-19.044, P=0.001). An ISI level >3.12 predicted unfavorable outcomes with a sensitivity and specificity of 74.6% and 85.2%, respectively (P<0.001). The prognostic performance of ISI (area under the curve [AUC]=0.887) was similar to that of other predictors, such as gray-to-white matter ratio (AUC=0.850, P=0.433) and neuron-specific enolase (AUC=0.925, P=0.394).
CONCLUSION: ISI may be used as a prognostic biomarker to predict neurological outcomes in CA patients following ECPR.

Key words: Cardiac arrest, Ion shift index, Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Gannan Wang, Zhe Wang, Yi Zhu, Zhongman Zhang, Wei Li, Xufeng Chen, Yong Mei. The neuro-prognostic value of the ion shift index in cardiac arrest patients following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2023, 14(5): 354-359.

Figures/Tables 4

Figure 1.

Table 1.

Clinical and laboratory characteristics of enrolled patients

Characteristics	Favorable neurological outcome (n=34)	Unfavorable neurological outcome (n=88)	t/χ²/Z	P-value
Age, years, mean±SD	52.35±14.76	49.28±17.02	0.925	0.357
Male, n (%)	22 (64.7)	67 (76.1)	1.624	0.203
Comorbidities, n (%)
Hypertension	14 (41.2)	30 (34.1)	0.534	0.465
Diabetes	8 (23.5)	17 (19.3)	0.267	0.605
Coronary artery disease	2 (5.9)	8 (9.1)	0.045	0.833
OHCA, n (%)	7 (20.6)	39 (44.3)	5.880	0.015
Witnessed, n (%)	34 (100)	80 (90.9)	1.991	0.158
Bystander CPR, n (%)	34 (100)	73 (83.0)	5.122	0.024
Cardiac etiology, n (%)	27 (79.4)	68 (77.3)	0.065	0.799
Initial non-shockable rhythm, n (%)	23 (67.6)	44 (50.0)	3.085	0.079
Resuscitation duration, min, median (IQR)	40.5 (17.5-55.0)	50.0 (34.0-82.3)	-2.639	0.008
ECMO duration, h, median (IQR)	141.5 (122.8-187.8)	94.4 (49.3-169.3)	-3.278	0.001
Length of stay in hospital, d, median (IQR)	19 (15-27)	5 (3-11)	-6.609	<0.001
GCS score after ECPR, median (IQR)	9 (8-12)	3 (3-4)	-7.765	<0.001
Prognostic predictors
GCS-M ≤2, n (%)	5 (14.7)	81 (92.0)	70.522	<0.001
Pupillary/corneal reflex absence, n (%)	0 (0)	51 (58.0)	33.859	<0.001
GWR-basal ganglia, median (IQR)	1.25 (1.20-1.27)	1.14 (1.08-1.19)	-5.977	<0.001
NSE, ng/mL, median (IQR)	44.6 (38.3-60.7)	188.5 (88.1-370.0)	-6.972	<0.001
Laboratory parameters, median (IQR)
Hemoglobin, g/L	116.5 (101.0-132.3)	111.0 (84.0-129.0)	-1.385	0.166
pH	7.41 (7.31-7.52)	7.22 (6.96-7.36)	-4.046	<0.001
Lactate, mmol/L	3.1 (1.1-11.5)	10.2 (4.0-15.6)	-2.854	0.004
Glucose, mmol/L	9.5 (6.7-11.7)	10.1 (7.1-13.5)	-0.504	0.614
Albumin, g/L	33.8 (30.3-39.3)	31.8 (26.5-39.2)	-1.008	0.313
ALT, U/L	159.0 (102.1-309.6)	306.1 (120.5-801.5)	-2.438	0.015
Aspartate aminotransferase, U/L	420.3 (170.1-932.0)	926.7 (364.6-2176.5)	-2.889	0.004
Total bilirubin, μmol/L	14.0 (10.8-19.9)	20.1 (13.1-32.2)	-2.204	0.028
Creatinine, μmol/L	96.1 (69.0-137.7)	76.5 (103.2-148.2)	-1.074	0.283
Potassium, mmol/L	3.9 (3.6-4.3)	4.5 (3.8-5.2)	-3.489	<0.001
Magnesium, mmol/L	0.9 (0.8-1.0)	1.0 (0.9-1.1)	-1.994	0.046
Phosphate, mmol/L	1.0 (0.7-1.2)	1.2 (0.8-2.1)	-2.778	0.005
Calcium, mmol/L	2.1 (2.0-2.2)	1.9 (1.6-2.1)	-3.907	<0.001
Ion shift index	2.69 (2.51-3.07)	3.74 (3.15-4.57)	-6.504	<0.001

Table 1.

Table 2.

Figure 2.

References 21

1	Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2023 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2023; 147(8):e93-e621.
2	Fukuda T, Ohashi-Fukuda N, Sekiguchi H, Inokuchi R, Kukita I. Survival from pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during nights and weekends: an updated Japanese registry-based study. JACC Asia. 2022; 2(4):433-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.01.005
3	Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2023 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023; 147(8):e93-e621.
4	Suverein MM, Delnoij TSR, Lorusso R, Brandon Bravo Bruinsma GJ, Otterspoor L, Elzo Kraemer CV, et al. Early extracorporeal CPR for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2023; 388(4):299-309. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204511
5	Abrams D, MacLaren G, Lorusso R, Price S, Yannopoulos D, Vercaemst L, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults: evidence and implications. Intensive Care Med. 2022; 48(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06514-y
6	Scquizzato T, Bonaccorso A, Swol J, Gamberini L, Scandroglio AM, Landoni G, et al. Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Artif Organs. 2023; 47(5):806-16. doi: 10.1111/aor.v47.5
7	Henson T, Rawanduzy C, Salazar M, Sebastian A, Weber H, Al-Mufti F, et al. Outcome and prognostication after cardiac arrest. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2022; 1508(1):23-34. doi: 10.1111/nyas.v1508.1
8	Ryczek R, Kwasiborski PJ, Rzeszotarska A, Dymus J, Galas A, Kaźmierczak-Dziuk A, et al. Neuron-specific enolase and S100B: the earliest predictors of poor outcome in cardiac arrest. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(9):2344. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092344
9	Sandroni C, Cronberg T, Sekhon M. Brain injury after cardiac arrest: pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis. Intensive Care Med. 2021; 47(12):1393-414. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06548-2 pmid: 34705079
10	Lee HY, Jung YH, Jeung KW, Lee BK, Youn CS, Mamadjonov N, et al. Ion shift index as a promising prognostic indicator in adult patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2019; 137:116-23. doi: S0300-9572(18)31038-4 pmid: 30807816
11	Michels G, Wengenmayer T, Hagl C, Dohmen C, Böttiger BW, Bauersachs J, et al. Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR): consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019; 108(5):455-64. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1366-4 pmid: 30361819
12	Wang GN, Chen XF, Lv JR, Sun NN, Xu XQ, Zhang JS. The prognostic value of gray-white matter ratio on brain computed tomography in adult comatose cardiac arrest survivors. J Chin Med Assoc. 2018; 81(7):599-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2018.03.003
13	Chung-Esaki HM, Mui G, Mlynash M, Eyngorn I, Catabay K, Hirsch KG. The neuron specific enolase (NSE) ratio offers benefits over absolute value thresholds in post-cardiac arrest coma prognosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2018; 57:99-104. doi: S0967-5868(18)30642-8 pmid: 30145080
14	Ajam K, Gold LS, Beck SS, Damon S, Phelps R, Rea TD. Reliability of the cerebral performance category to classify neurological status among survivors of ventricular fibrillation arrest: a cohort study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011; 19:38. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-38
15	DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988; 44(3):837-45. pmid: 3203132
16	Sandroni C, D’Arrigo S, Cacciola S, Hoedemaekers CWE, Kamps MJA, Oddo M, et al. Prediction of poor neurological outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46(10):1803-51. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06198-w pmid: 32915254
17	Kim B, Kwon H, Kim SM, Kim JS, Ryoo SM, Kim YJ, et al. Ion shift index at the immediate post-cardiac arrest period as an early prognostic marker in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(20):6187. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206187
18	Youngquist ST, Heyming T, Rosborough JP, Niemann JT. Hypocalcemia following resuscitation from cardiac arrest revisited. Resuscitation. 2010; 81(1):117-22. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.10.002 pmid: 19913975
19	Jung YH, Lee BK, Jeung KW, Youn CS, Lee DH, Lee SM, et al. Prognostic value of serum phosphate level in adult patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2018; 128:56-62. doi: S0300-9572(18)30183-7 pmid: 29702189
20	Lee DH, Cho IS, Lee SH, Min YI, Min JH, Kim SH, et al. Correlation between initial serum levels of lactate after return of spontaneous circulation and survival and neurological outcomes in patients who undergo therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2015; 88:143-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.005 pmid: 25450570
21	Wyckoff MH, Singletary EM, Soar J, Olasveengen TM, Greif R, Liley HG, et al. 2021 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations: summary from the basic life support; advanced life support; neonatal life support; education, implementation, and teams; First Aid Task Forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group. Circulation. 2022; 145(9):e645-e721.

Parameters	Coefficient	OR	95% CI	P-value
Initial non-shockable rhythm	1.581	4.862	1.249-18.927	0.023
ALT, U/L	0.002	1.002	0.999-1.005	0.065
pH	8.986	0.001	0.001-0.036	0.002
Lactate, mmol/L	0.155	1.168	0.990-1.378	0.066
Ion shift index	1.876	6.529	2.239-19.044	0.001

[1]	Guang-qi Guo, Yan-nan Ma, Shuang Xu, Hong-rong Zhang, Peng Sun. Effect of post-rewarming fever after targeted temperature management in cardiac arrest patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2023, 14(3): 217-223.
[2]	Gan-nan Wang, Zhong-man Zhang, Wen Chen, Xiao-quan Xu, Jin-song Zhang. Timing of brain computed tomography for predicting neurological prognosis in comatose cardiac arrest survivors: a retrospective observational study [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2022, 13(5): 349-354.
[3]	Shi-jiao Yan, Mei Chen, Jing Wen, Wen-ning Fu, Xing-yue Song, Huan-jun Chen, Ri-xing Wang, Mei-ling Chen, Xiao-tong Han, Chuan-zhu Lyu. Global research trends in cardiac arrest research: a visual analysis of the literature based on CiteSpace [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2022, 13(4): 290-296.
[4]	Hong-li Xiao, Lian-xing Zhao, Jun Yang, Nan Tong, Le An, Guo-xing Wang, Miao-rong Xie, Chun-sheng Li. Increasing angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) 2/ACE axes ratio alleviates early pulmonary vascular remodeling in a porcine model of acute pulmonary embolism with cardiac arrest [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2022, 13(3): 208-214.
[5]	Chao-yu Lei, Heng-wei Qin, Xue-jie Dong, Jia-lin You, Lin Zhang. Layperson’s performance on an unconversant type of AED device: A prospective crossover simulation experimental study [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2022, 13(2): 98-105.
[6]	Ji-yang Ling, Chun-sheng Li, Yun Zhang, Xiao-li Yuan, Bo Liu, Yong Liang, Qiang Zhang. Protective effect of extracorporeal membrane pulmonary oxygenation combined with cardiopulmonary resuscitation on post-resuscitation lung injury [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2021, 12(4): 303-308.
[7]	Wei-jing Shao, Ting-ting Shu, Shuang Xu, Li-cai Liang, Jehane Michael Le Grange, Yu-ran Zhou, He Huang, Yu Cai, Qing Zhang, Peng Sun. Left-sided vagus nerve stimulation improves cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes in rats as effectively as right-sided vagus nerve stimulation [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2021, 12(4): 309-316.
[8]	Xue-jie Dong, Lin Zhang, Yue-lin Yu, Shu-xiao Shi, Xiao-chen Yang, Xiao-qian Zhang, Shuang Tian, Helge Myklebust, Guo-hong Li, Zhi-jie Zheng. The general public’s ability to operate automated external defibrillator: A controlled simulation study [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2020, 11(4): 238-245.
[9]	Ye-cheng Liu, Yan-meng Qi, Hui Zhang, Joseph Walline, Hua-dong Zhu. A survey of ventilation strategies during cardiopulmonary resuscitation [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2019, 10(4): 222-227.
[10]	Alexei Birkun, Yekaterina Kosova. Social attitude and willingness to attend cardiopulmonary resuscitation training and perform resuscitation in the Crimea [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2018, 9(4): 237-248.
[11]	Alexei Birkun, Maksim Glotov, Herman Franklin Ndjamen, Esther Alaiye, Temidara Adeleke, Sergey Samarin. Pre-recorded instructional audio vs. dispatchers’ conversational assistance in telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized controlled simulation study [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2018, 9(3): 165-171.
[12]	Alexei Birkun, Maksim Glotov. Education in cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Russia: A systematic review of the available evidence [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2017, 8(4): 245-252.
[13]	Chennappa Kalvatala Krishna, Hakim Irfan Showkat, Meenakshi Taktani, Vikram Khatri. Out of hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation outcome in North India — CARO study [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2017, 8(3): 200-205.
[14]	Ji Ung Na, Sang Kuk Han, Pil Cho Choi, Dong Hyuk Shin. Effect of metronome rates on the quality of bag-mask ventilation during metronome-guided 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized simulation study [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2017, 8(2): 136-140.
[15]	Gan-nan Wang, Xu-feng Chen, Li Qiao, Yong Mei, Jin-ru Lv, Xi-hua Huang, Bin Shen, Jin-song Zhang. Comparison of extracorporeal and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A meta-analysis of 2 260 patients with cardiac arrest [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2017, 8(1): 5-11.