Sign In    Register

World Journal of Emergency Medicine ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (5): 367-372.doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.072

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Is rosuvastatin protective against sepsis-associated encephalopathy? A secondary analysis of the SAILS trial

Shi-yuan Yu1, Zeng-zheng Ge1, Jun Xiang2, Yan-xia Gao3, Xin Lu1, Joseph Harold Walline4, Mu-bing Qin1, Hua-dong Zhu1, Yi Li1()   

  1. 1Emergency Department, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
    2General Medicine Department of Jingnan Medical Center, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100039, China
    3Emergency Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
    4Department of Emergency Medicine, Penn State Health, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey 17033, USA
  • Received:2021-12-19 Accepted:2022-04-20 Online:2022-08-23 Published:2022-09-01
  • Contact: Yi Li E-mail:billlyi@126.com

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a common cause of death in emergency departments and sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a major complication. Rosuvastatin may play a neuroprotective role due to its protective effects on the vascular endothelium and its anti-inflammatory functions. Our study aimed to explore the potential protective function of rosuvastatin against SAE.

METHODS: Sepsis patients without any neurological dysfunction on admission were prospectively enrolled in the “Rosuvastatin for Sepsis-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome” study (SAILS trial, ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00979121). Patients were divided into rosuvastatin and placebo groups. This is a secondary analysis of the SAILS dataset. Baseline characteristics, therapy outcomes, and adverse drug events were compared between groups.

RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were eligible for our study. Of these patients, 51 were treated with rosuvastatin. There were significantly fewer cases of SAE in the rosuvastatin group than in the placebo group (32.1% vs. 57.1%, P=0.028). However, creatine kinase levels were significantly higher in the rosuvastatin group than in the placebo group (233 [22-689] U/L vs. 79 [12-206] U/L, P=0.034).

CONCLUSION: Rosuvastatin appears to have a protective role against SAE but may result in a higher incidence of adverse events.

Key words: Rosuvastatin calcium, Sepsis-associated encephalopathy, Anti-inflammatory agents, Sepsis, Adverse reactions