Sign In    Register

World Journal of Emergency Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 28-34.doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.012

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Real-world cost-effectiveness of targeted temperature management in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors: results from an academic medical center

Wachira Wongtanasarasin1,2(), Daniel K. Nishijima2, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai3,4, Jeffrey S. Hoch5,6   

  1. 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    2Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento 95817, USA
    3Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok 11000, Thailand
    4Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto M5T 3M6, Canada
    5Division of Health Policy and Management, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento 95817, USA
    6Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento 95817, USA
  • Received:2024-06-12 Accepted:2024-11-16 Online:2025-01-23 Published:2025-01-01
  • Contact: Wachira Wongtanasarasin E-mail:wachir_w@hotmail.com

Abstract:

BACKGROUND Targeted temperature management (TTM) is a common therapeutic intervention, yet its cost-effectiveness remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world cost-effectiveness of TTM compared with that of conventional care in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors using clinical patient-level data.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at an academic medical center in the USA to assess the cost-effectiveness of TTM in adult non-traumatic OHCA survivors between 1 January, 2019 and 30 June, 2023. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated and compared with various decision makers’ willingness to pay. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were utilized to evaluate the economic attractiveness of TTM. Uncertainty about the incremental cost and effect was explored with a 95% confidence ellipse.

RESULTS: Among 925 non-traumatic OHCA survivors, only 30 (3%) received TTM. After adjusting for potential confounders, the TTM group did not demonstrate a significantly lower cost (delta cost -\$5,141, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: \$-35,347 to $25,065, P=0.79) and higher survival to hospital discharge (delta effect 6%, 95% CI: -11% to 23%, P=0.41). Additionally, a 95% confidence ellipse indicated uncertainty reflected by evidence that the true value of the ICER could be in any of the quadrants of the cost-effectiveness plane.

CONCLUSION: Although TTM did not demonstrate a clear survival benefit in this study, its potential cost-effectiveness warrants further investigation with larger sample sizes. These findings highlight the need for additional research to optimize TTM use in OHCA care and inform resource allocation decisions.

Key words: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, Targeted temperature management, Cost-effectiveness, Survival, Real-world data