World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2024, 15(5): 333-355 doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.076

Guideline

The Chinese guideline for management of snakebites

Rongde Lai,1, Shijiao Yan2, Shijun Wang3, Shuqing Yang4, Zhangren Yan5, Pin Lan6, Yonggao Wang7, Qi Li8, Jinlong Wang9, Wei Wang10, Yuefeng Ma,11, Zijing Liang,12, Jianfeng Zhang,13, Ning Zhou,14, Xiaotong Han,15, Xinchao Zhang,16, Mao Zhang,17, Xiaodong Zhao,18, Guoqiang Zhang,19, Huadong Zhu,20, Xuezhong Yu,20, Chuanzhu Lyu,21,22

1Emergency Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China

2School of Public Health, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571199, China

3Surgery Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the Affiliated People’s Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350004, China

4Emergency Department, Chongqing University Central Hospital/Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing 400014, China

5Department of Surgery of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang 330006, China

6Department of Emergency Medicine, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University/Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui Hospital of Zhejiang University, Lishui 323000,China

7General Surgery Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, China

8Emergency Department, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China

9Emergency Department, Chongqing University Fuling Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing 408000, China

10Emergency Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China

11Emergency Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China

12Emergency Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China

13Emergency Department, Wuming Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China

14Emergency Department, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang 524037, China

15Emergency Department, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha 410005, China

16Emergency Department, National Geriatrics Center of Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100020, China

17Emergency Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China

18Emergency Department, the Fourth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China

19Emergency Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China

20Emergency Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, BeiJing 100730, China

21Emergency Department, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences/Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China

22Research Unit of Island Emergency Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No. 2019RU013), Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571199, China

Corresponding authors: Rongde Lai, Email:lairongde@163.com;Yuefeng Ma, Email:2193017@zju.edu.cn;Zijing Liang, Email:13719337897@163.com;Jianfeng Zhang, Email:zhangjf.gxmu@163.com;Ning Zhou, Email:zjzhou121@163.com;Xiaotong Han, Email:744953695@qq.com;Xinchao Zhang, Email:xinchaoz@163.com;Mao Zhang, Email:z2jzk@zju.edu.cn;Xiaodong Zhao, Email:zxd63715@126.com;Guoqiang Zhang, Email:zhangchong2003@vip.sina.com;Huadong Zhu, Email:zhuhuadong1970@126.com;Xuezhong Yu, Email:yxzpumch@126.com;Chuanzhu Lyu, Email:lvchuanzhu677@126.com

Received: 2024-06-6  

Abstract

In 2009, the World Health Organization included snakebite on the list of neglected tropical diseases, acknowledging it as a common occupational hazard for farmers, plantation workers, and others, causing tens of thousands of deaths and chronic physical disabilities every year. This guideline aims to provide practical information to help clinical professionals evaluate and treat snakebite victims. These recommendations are based on clinical experience and clinical research evidence. This guideline focuses on the following topics: snake venom, clinical manifestations, auxiliary examination, diagnosis, treatments, and prevention.

Keywords: Snakebite; Envenomation; Management; Prevention

PDF (370KB) Metadata Metrics Related articles Export EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  Favorite

Cite this article

Rongde Lai, Shijiao Yan, Shijun Wang, Shuqing Yang, Zhangren Yan, Pin Lan, Yonggao Wang, Qi Li, Jinlong Wang, Wei Wang, Yuefeng Ma, Zijing Liang, Jianfeng Zhang, Ning Zhou, Xiaotong Han, Xinchao Zhang, Mao Zhang, Xiaodong Zhao, Guoqiang Zhang, Huadong Zhu, Xuezhong Yu, Chuanzhu Lyu. The Chinese guideline for management of snakebites. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2024, 15(5): 333-355 doi:10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.076

INTRODUCTION

More than 4,000 species of snakes are found worldwide, with more than half being colubrid snakes and approximately 20% being venomous snakes (over 800 species), including more than 400 species of cobras and more than 380 species of viper.[1] Nearly 250 species of venomous snakes are of great medical importance.[2] Snakebites are an important public health concern, mainly affecting tropical areas on both sides of the equator, with the highest incidence in Southeast Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and South America. Approximately 95% of snakebites occur in developing countries. Out of the 4.5-5.4 million cases of snakebites worldwide each year, approximately 20% are “dry bites” without detoxification (i.e., no release of toxins during the bite, no symptoms or signs of poisoning or only minor wound manifestations).[3]Approximately 1.8-2.7 million people are severely poisoned, and nearly 400,000 snakebite victims develop varying degrees of disability.[4-5] Snakebites cause 81,000-138,000 deaths worldwide, with a mortality rate of up to 0.8/100,000.[6]

China has a diverse range of snake species distributed throughout the country, mainly south of the Yangtze River. More than 300 species of snakes have been identified, including more than 100 species of venomous snakes, of which more than 80 species are highly toxic species of the Elapidae and Viperidae families, and a few are venomous species of the family Colubridae.[1] WHO has identified 23 medically important venomous snake species in China.[2] An estimated 250,000-280,000 cases of venomous snakebites occur in China each year, affecting mainly patients aged ≥50 years. Limbs are the most frequently bitten parts of the body, with lower limbs being more commonly affected than upper limbs. Snakebites frequently occur from April to October each year, with the peak incidence occurring from July to September.[1] There are significant differences in the venomous snake spectrum among Chinese provinces and regions, and the level of treatment for snakebites varies greatly from region to region, resulting in high mortality and disability rates. This guideline aims to improve public awareness of snakebites and facilitate standardization of the clinical treatment of snakebites. The overarching objective is to reduce snakebite-associated mortality and disability.

METHODS

This guideline follows the basic principles of evidence-based medicine. Studies that reported all the important clinical issues related to snakebites were identified from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP (Weipu), and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform from their inception to December 31, 2023. The search terms were “snake venom” or “venom” or “toxin” or “toxic” or “poisoning” or “snakebite” or “snakebite(s)” or “envenomation” or “antivenom” or “anti-snake” or “anti-snake venom” or “antivenin” or “snakebite management” or “snakebite treatment.”

This guideline adheres to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence evaluation system, categorizing evidence into three levels: Level A is high-quality evidence emanating from randomized controlled trials or large-sample meta-analyses; Level B is moderate-quality evidence, such as that from non-randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, systematic reviews, or clinical case series; and Level C is low-quality evidence based on expert opinions or individual case reports. The strength of the recommendation consisted of three items: Level I is proven and/or agreed to be beneficial or effective, and implementation is strongly recommended; Level II is limited or inconsistent, and implementation is appropriate or feasible, but with caution; Level III is proven or agreed to be harmful and is not recommended or opposed to implementation.

SNAKES AND SNAKE VENOM

Non-venomous snakes

There are nearly 200 species of non-venomous snakes in China, including common non-venomous snakes such as Zaocys dhumnades, Elaphe dione, water snake, Coelognathus radiatus, Lycodon rufozonatus, Cyclophiops major, Elaphe taeniura, Ptyas mucosus, Elaphe carinata, Euprepiophis mandarinus, Amphiesma stolatum, Xenochrophis piscator, Xenochrophis flavipunctatus, yellow-spotted keelback, Oligodon chinensis, Sinonatrix aequifasciata, and python.

Venomous snakes

Venomous snakes are clinically classified into neurotoxic, hemotoxic, and cytotoxic snakes based on the toxic effects of snake venom on the human body. Different venomous snakes contain various toxins. For example, the king cobra mainly contains neurotoxin and hemotoxin, the pit viper mainly contains hemotoxin supplemented with neurotoxin, the Eastern Russell’s viper mainly contains hemotoxin supplemented with renal cytotoxin, and the sea snake mainly contains neurotoxin supplemented with renal cytotoxin. Common venomous snakes are classified according to their main toxins: (1) neurotoxic snakes: Bungarus multicinctus, Bungarus fasciatus, Ophiophagus hannah (King Cobra), sea snakes; (2) hemotoxic snakes: Trimeresurus stejnegeri, pit viper, Deinagkistrodon acutus, Viperidae, Protobothrops mucrosquamatus, Rhabdophis subminiatus, and Rhabdophis tigrinus; (3) cytotoxic snakes: Chinese cobra.

Snake venom and its mechanism

Snake venom is a complex high-efficiency toxin mixture characterized by its pale yellow or milky white, translucent, and viscous liquid appearance. It is mainly composed of proteins (such as enzymes, polypeptides, and glycoproteins) and non-protein ingredients (such as lipids, metal ions, and biogenic amines). Proteins account for 90%-95% of the dry weight of snake venom.[7-8] Each venomous snake contains a diverse array of toxins, ranging from 20 to over 100 different components, and the types of toxins vary within and between species,[9-10] depending on the region, season, and age of the snake.[11-12] The toxins of the Cobra family are dominated by three-finger toxins and phospholipase A2 (PLA2), while those of the Viper family are dominated by snake venom metalloproteinases, PLA2, and snake venom serine proteases.[13] Snake venom proteins can produce various toxic effects depending on their targets.[9,14-15] For example, PLA2 mainly acts on various receptors in the plasma membrane and axonal membrane of muscle cells.[16] Snake venom metalloproteinases have multiple targets, the most notable being type IV collagen and coagulation factors.[17] Snake venom serine proteases mainly affect coagulation factors.[9] Three-finger toxins act on nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, and acetylcholinesterase, and block neuromuscular impulse transmission.[18] Some toxins may have relatively low toxicity when isolated, but when mixed with other toxins in the venom, they enhance each other’s toxicity. This synergistic effect amplifies overall venom toxicity.[19]

Hematological damage

Hemotoxins are commonly found in toxins of Viperidae, cobras, and Salviidae. These most commonly affect the clotting cascade and platelets.[15] Snake venom factor V activator, factor X activator, prothrombin activator, and procoagulant enzymes result in coagulable blood. Factor IX/X binding protein, protein C activator, thrombin inhibitor, and PLA2 exhibit anticoagulant properties; fibrinolytic enzymes and plasminogen activator have fibrinolytic activity. Snake venom metalloproteinases, disintegrins, and C-type lectins directly damage the vascular wall.[20] Snake venom may promote or inhibit platelet aggregation. For example, serine proteases promote platelet aggregation; disintegrin and 5-nucleotidases inhibit platelet aggregation; and PLA2s, metalloproteinases, C-type lectin-like proteins, and different subtypes of L-amino acid oxidases inhibit or promote platelet aggregation.[21] Snake venom is absorbed through lymphatic vessels and capillaries, and macromolecules are absorbed through the lymphatic system. Enzyme toxins such as metalloproteinases impair the integrity of lymphatic vessels, increasing their permeability and promoting or aggravating local edema.[15]

Nervous system damage

Toxins act on the neuromuscular junction of skeletal muscle. The main targets of toxins are acetylcholine receptors on motor nerve endings (presynaptic membrane) and motor endplates (postsynaptic membrane), resulting in flaccid paralysis, which is observed in most Elapidae and a few viper venom bites. β-bungarotoxin, PLA2, and dendrimer toxins act on the presynaptic membrane; α-bungarotoxin, weak toxin, black green ironhead toxin, and PLA2 act on the postsynaptic membrane; acetylcholinesterase acts on the synaptic cleft.[15] Most venomous snakes contain only a single neurotoxin that binds to the presynaptic membrane (such as the Sri Lankan viper, many-banded krait, and Coastal Taipan) or the postsynaptic membrane (such as the king cobra and cobra). Many-banded krait venom contains α-bungarotoxin, β-bungarotoxin, κ-bungarotoxin, and γ-bungarotoxin, which affect both presynaptic and postsynaptic membranes.[1,22] Most toxins have a high affinity for binding to neuromuscular receptors and are not easily dissociated, especially after binding to presynaptic receptors, which impedes clinical recovery. However, the effects of postsynaptic neurotoxins can be rapidly reversed by antivenom serum. [23-24] The three-finger toxin PLA2 and weak toxin of the Bengal cobra have certain effects on the autonomic nervous system.[15]

Cytotoxicity

Cytotoxicity is an important effect of the family of low-molecular-weight non-enzymatic three-finger toxins widely present in the venom of the cobra family and a few Viperidae snakes. The Chinese cobra has the highest cytotoxic content among Asian cobras, accounting for approximately 70% of the total toxins.[12] Cytotoxins affect cell membrane structure and membrane-binding proteins, activating apoptosis and necrotic cell death pathways, which are mostly non-specific effects, resulting in local tissue and skin damage. Cytotoxins in the cobra venom can also depolarize neurons and myocardium, leading to heart failure.

Kidney damage

Bites of some venomous snakes, notably viperaceous snakes, can cause acute kidney injury. PLA2, metalloproteinase, hyaluronidase, and serine proteinase present in the venom of Vipera russelli, sea snake, and rattlesnake can cause injury to glomeruli, renal tubules, and renal vessels. Some non-enzymatic components can also directly cause nephrotoxicity.[25]

Cardiovascular damage

PLA2 is present in the venom of almost all venomous snakes. It can synergically induce hypotension with snake venom natriuretic peptide, bradykinin-enhancing peptide, vascular endothelial growth factor, snake venom metalloproteinase, and serine proteinase. The three-finger toxin induces hypotension by blocking L-type calcium ion channels and interacting with adrenergic and muscarinic receptors. Venom adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase), adenosine-5-diphosphate (ADP enzyme), and nucleotidase catalyze the decomposition of ATP into ADP, adenosine monophosphate (AMP), and adenosine, further promote a proinflammatory response (vascular dilation and increased permeability) and reduce blood pressure.[26] Serine proteinases and metalloproteinases can induce bleeding and coagulation disorders, produce snake venom-induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC), and reduce effective blood volume. Some snake venoms cause vasoconstriction, microthrombi formation, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and thrombocytopenia, thereby reducing effective circulation.[27] Other mechanisms of cardiovascular damage include direct injury to the myocardial cell membrane, the induction of arrhythmia, secondary hypercoagulability-induced coronary syndrome and coronary spasm, secondary hyperkalemia resulting from acute renal failure, and the proinflammatory effect of hypersensitivity reactions to snake venom.[26,28]

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS

The clinical manifestations of venomous snakebites vary depending on the snake species or toxin content. Approximately 20% (1.75%-50%) of venomous snakebites are “dry bites”.[3] The severity of toxic manifestations depends on the amount of venom released by the snake and the time elapsed between the bite and medical treatment.[29] The main clinical manifestations are the neurotoxic triad (bilateral ptosis, descending paralysis, dyspnea/acute respiratory failure), the hematotoxic triad (consumptive coagulopathy, local bleeding, and systemic bleeding), and the cytotoxic triad (severe pain, progressive swelling, and tissue damage). Some Colubridae are known to produce varying degrees of toxic effects.[30] Most victims present with mild pain, tooth marks or lacerations, local mild reactive edema, or small amounts of bleeding, which usually resolve within 24-36 h. A minority of cases exhibit severe symptoms.

General symptoms

Local symptoms include tooth marks, varying degrees of pain, local bleeding, enlarged lymph nodes, lymphangitis, local swelling, erythema, increased skin temperature, blisters (both hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic), ecchymosis, and subsequent local infection, abscess formation, gas gangrene, and necrosis. Some patients may also experience non-specific systemic symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, fatigue, abdominal pain, dizziness, headache, fever, sweating, or diarrhea.

Neurological manifestations

Neurotoxic snakes such as Bungarus multicinctus mainly cause flaccid and descending paralysis, gradually affecting muscles innervated by cranial nerves as well as cervical flexor muscles, medulla oblongata, respiratory muscles, trunk and limb muscles. Typical descending paralysis first involves the eyelid muscles, manifesting as bilateral ptosis, typically occurring within hours of the bite. Next, the external eye muscles are involved, causing diplopia, fixed pupil dilation, facial paralysis with slurred speech and difficulty opening the mouth. The palate, mandible, tongue, and throat are subsequently involved, resulting in the accumulation of pharyngeal secretions and the loss of the pharyngeal reflex. Then, the paralysis symptoms develop and continue to descend to the neck muscles and medulla oblongata muscles. The involvement of medulla oblongata causes difficulty in swallowing and the loss of airway protection function, leading to a high risk of aspiration or suffocation. Cervical muscle paralysis may manifest as a soft and weak neck. The involvement of respiratory muscles leads to shallow and rapid breathing, decreased ventilation capacity, abnormal abdominal breathing, use of auxiliary muscles, and cyanosis. Once severe dyspnea occurs, it will quickly lead to respiratory arrest. The time elapsed between snakebite and the occurrence of respiratory failure ranges from 30 min to more than 24 h, with an average of 6-12 h. Finally, the limb muscles are involved, manifesting as weakness. The proximal muscles are involved first, followed by the distal muscles. In severe cases, complete paralysis of the limbs may occur, with attenuation or disappearance of deep tendon reflexes. The recovery of neurological function usually occurs in the reverse sequence. Distal muscle strength first recovers, followed by a gradual recovery of proximal muscle strength, and finally upper eyelid ptosis and ophthalmoplegia.[1,27,31]

Hematological manifestations

Hemotoxic snakes such as Trimeresurus stejnegeri mainly cause coagulopathy, referred to as VICC. VICC manifests as wound bleeding or even uncontrollable bleeding, petechiae, ecchymosis, hematemesis, black stool, hemoptysis, and hematuria. Severe cases may develop bleeding in important organs (such as the brain) and hypovolemic shock.[32]

Cytotoxic manifestations

The main symptoms are localized pain and swelling that spread from the site of the bite to the surrounding areas, with the appearance of blisters, skin necrosis or infection, and local bruising. If the swelling exceeds the elastic limit of the skin, it can induce fascia compartment syndrome-like symptoms such as pain, passive stretching pain, sensory abnormalities, and limb paralysis. Rarely, there may be skin pallor and a lack of pulses.[33-34]

Other manifestations

Cardiovascular manifestations include palpitations, hypotension, shock, and arrhythmia. Urinary manifestations include acute kidney injury or uremia symptoms such as low back pain, hematuria, hemoglobinuria, myoglobinuria, and oliguria/anuria. Skeletal musclar manifestations include generalized pain, muscle stiffness, tenderness, and difficulty opening the mouth. Endocrine system involvement may present with hypopituitarism, shock, hypoglycemia, secondary hair loss, sexual dysfunction, amenorrhea, testicular atrophy, or hypothyroidism.[35] The venom of venomous cobras, such as the spitting cobra and the Chinese cobra, can cause severe eye pain, inability to open the eyes, excessive lacrimation, conjunctival congestion, blepharitis, eyelid spasm, corneal erosion and other manifestations of snake venom-related ophthalmia. Delayed treatment or a lack of treatment may lead to corneal opacity, anterior chamber effusion, and blindness.[36]

AUXILIARY EXAMINATION

Laboratory examination

Routine blood examination reveals an increase in white blood cell and neutrophil counts, with a leftward shift in the nucleus (indicating immature neutrophils), which is often caused by stress in the early stages. In patients with significant bleeding or hemolysis, there may be a decrease in red blood cell count and hemoglobin. Patients bitten by some snake species are prone to thrombocytopenia. Patients with VICC may also present thrombocytopenia. Hematuria, black urine, oliguria, anuria, proteinuria, or casts suggest acute kidney injury. Intravascular hemolysis may present as hemoglobinuria. Muscle injury or dissolution may present as myoglobinuria and hyperkalemia. Abnormal results of coagulation-fibrinolytic system tests, such as international normalized ratio (INR), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen, D-dimer, bleeding time (BT), thrombin time, antithrombin III (AT-III), and protamine paracoagulant (3P) tests, suggest blood poisoning from snakebites. Thromboelastography (TEG) can reflect dynamic changes in blood coagulation or fibrinolytic processes, including the formation and development of blood clots and the retraction and dissolution of blood clots, and provide information on the speed, intensity, and stability of thrombogenesis. It is suitable for evaluating coagulopathy after hematotoxic snakebites and can be used as an auxiliary test.[37-39]

Routine blood biochemical tests, liver and kidney function tests, and (cardiac) muscle enzyme profiles are performed to assess the internal environment and vital organ function. Blood gas analysis can help evaluate respiratory function and electrolyte abnormalities; blood lactate levels can reflect changes in circulatory perfusion and tissue metabolism. The 20-minute whole blood agglutination test is a highly specific (specificity 98%) and sensitive (sensitivity 82%) bedside test for detecting coagulopathy after snakebite.[40] It is simple and easy to perform and is particularly suitable for resource-limited settings and for those who have not had laboratory tests for coagulation function for a long time, but the positive rate is low, within 3 h. [41]

Recommendation 1: Before anti-snake venom treatment, a baseline laboratory examination should be conducted, and appropriate dynamic assessment is also needed (Evidence level B, Recommendation I).

Imaging examination

An electrocardiogram (ECG) examination can detect cardiac manifestations, such as changes in cardiac rhythm, myocardial ischemia or infarction, and hyperkalemia. A chest X-ray or chest computed tomography (CT) scan can assess lung damage, especially pulmonary edema, pulmonary hemorrhage, and pleural effusion. CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for detecting internal bleeding or other structural changes, such as intracranial hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, and chest and abdominal hematoma. Ultrasound is suitable for detecting serous cavity effusion or hematoma and assessing cardiac function. Electromyography can help evaluate neuromuscular lesions, and electroencephalography can be used to evaluate “brain death-like changes” after a neurotoxic snakebite. If possible, infrared thermography can be used to visually assess the local inflammatory response at the bite site.[42-43] For those with confirmed or suspected snake venom injection into the eyes, an ophthalmologist should be consulted to assess the eye damage caused by snake venom-related ophthalmia.

Recommendation 2: For venomous snakebite patients, basic imaging evaluations of important organs, such as the heart and lungs, are recommended (Evidence level B, Recommendation I).

DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT

Diagnosis of snakebites

The diagnosis of snakebite is based on a comprehensive evaluation of medical history, physical examination, and laboratory or imaging results, combined with local epidemiological characteristics of snakebites. (1) Medical history. A suspected or confirmed history of snakebite is the primary diagnostic clue. The key points of history include the location, time, and place of the bite; on-site treatment measures; current symptoms; characteristics of the snake; and the progression of signs and symptoms. Special attention should be given to the use of medications for underlying diseases (such as anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs) and allergies. (2) Physical examination. Based on the local manifestations of snakebites, such as tooth marks and tooth spacing, wound and surrounding swelling, blisters, bleeding or bruising, skin color or rash, and regional lymph nodes, a physical examination of the whole body, especially important organs, should be conducted. Notably, for patients with neurotoxic snakebites, the pupillary light reflex, pain stimulation, or Glasgow Coma Scale score may not accurately reflect the clinical situation. (3) Laboratory or imaging examination results. (4) Determination of snake species. Snake species can be identified based on the characteristics of the snakebite, witness’s description of the snake characteristics, on-site photos of the snake (if available), or physical evidence such as inspection of the actual snake that caused the injury, or pictures of common venomous snakes in the local area for the injured person to identify, including the size, length or weight of the snake body, and color and body pattern characteristics. In some cases, it is impossible to directly witness or provide accurate information about the snake because of the poor light and grassy environment. In such cases, it is not necessary to overemphasize the characteristics or species of the snake, and a judgment can be made and treatment administered based on the toxic syndrome.

Recommendation 3: The diagnosis of venomous snakebites mainly depends on clinical characteristics of envenomation, avoiding overemphasizing the identification of the species responsible for snakebites (Evidence level C, Recommendation II).

Severity assessment

There are many methods for determining the severity of snakebites, and each evaluation method has advantages and disadvantages. This guideline recommends two evaluation methods for clinical reference. A simple method for assessing clinical severity is presented in Table 1.[1] This method is easy to remember and practice, suitable for clinical judgment by emergency physicians, but the content is relatively rough.

Table 1.   Clinical severity assessment of snakebites

SeverityClinical manifestations
No poisoningOnly teeth marks (“dry bite”) without any other symptoms and signs
LightOnly local symptoms around the wound, such as pain, bleeding from the wound, skin bruising, non-progressive limb swelling not exceeding the elbow or knee, and no progress in 12 h after the bite; local sensory abnormalities, numbness, neuropathic pain, muscle spasm, and fasciculation
ModerateProgressive swelling, purpura, or ecchymosis away from the wound, not exceeding half of the limb; non-fatal systemic symptoms or signs, such as nausea, vomiting, hematemesis/melena; mild perioral numbness, mild fatigue, respiratory muscle weakness resulting in dyspnea or other respiratory discomfort, language barriers, diplopia, hearing or taste abnormalities, and difficulty swallowing; slight changes in laboratory results (<2 times the upper limit of normal), mild abnormalities in coagulation function but no systemic bleeding
SevereLocal symptoms such as widespread swelling, erythema, or ecchymosis rapidly progressing beyond more than half of the body, or bites on the head, neck, or trunk; obvious symptoms and signs such as fatigue or progressive muscle weakness, blurred vision, ptosis, altered consciousness, tachycardia, shortness of breath or distress, or the need for mechanical ventilation support, hemodynamic instability (such as hypotension or shock), suspected or confirmed intracranial or abdominal bleeding; laboratory results showing significant abnormalities, such as severe coagulopathy with bleeding in areas other than the wound, thrombocytopenia, significant abnormalities in muscle enzymes (≥2 times the upper limit of normal)

New window| CSV


The Snakebite Severity Scale (SSS) is a method used to quantify the severity of snakebites based on clinical and laboratory results.[44,45] A score of 0 to 3 indicates mild snakebite, 4 to 7 indicates moderate snakebite, and ≥8 indicates severe snakebite. The SSS is an objective tool with detailed classification. It has been adopted by most countries, mainly for academic research. However, owing to its slight complexity, its original design intention is as a research tool rather than a clinical evaluation tool. Therefore, it is more suitable for population studies of snakebite incidents. If used for clinical diagnosis of patients, the SSS is effective in distinguishing severe poisoning but has poor discrimination for mild and moderate poisoning.[46] It is not specific for certain symptoms and signs, so its reliability is poor. The modified SSS incorporates indicators of kidney damage, improving its discrimination ability (Table 2). However, the score still has poor discrimination for neurotoxic snakebites. For evaluating and classifying neurotoxic snakebites, it is recommended to directly refer to the neurological assessment score in this modified SSS.

Table 2.   Modified snakebite severity scale

PositionSymptoms/SignsScore
LungsNo symptoms/signs0
Difficulty in breathing, mild chest tightness, mild discomfort, breathing 20-25 times/min1
Moderate respiratory distress (dyspnea, 26-40 breaths/min, use of auxiliary respiratory muscles)2
Cyanosis, feeling of insufficient air, severe shortness of breath, or respiratory distress/failure3
CardiovascularNo symptoms/signs0
Heart rate 100-125 beats/min, palpitations, general fatigue, benign arrhythmia or hypertension1
Heart rate 126-175 beats/min or hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg)2
Heart rate >175 beats/min or hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg), malignant arrhythmia, or cardiac arrest3
Local traumaNo symptoms/signs (swelling or erythema around the teeth mark <2.5 cm)0
Pain, swelling or bruising of the bite area <5.0-7.5 cm1
Pain, swelling or bruising of the bite area not extending beyond half of the limb (7.5-50.0 cm)2
Pain, swelling or bruising of the bite area extending over half of the limb (50-100 cm)3
Pain, swelling or bruising beyond the limb (> 100 cm from the bite site)4
Gastrointestinal tractNo symptoms/signs0
Abdominal pain, tenesmus, or nausea1
Vomiting or diarrhea2
Repeated vomiting, diarrhea, hematemesis, or hematochezia3
HematologyNo symptoms/signs0
Mild changes in coagulation parameters (PT < 20 s, APTT < 50 s, platelet count (100-150) × 10⁹/L, fibrinogen 100-150 mg/dL)1
Significantly abnormal coagulation parameters (PT 20-50 s, APTT 50-75 s, platelet count (50-100)×10⁹/L, fibrinogen 50-100 mg/dL)2
Significantly abnormal coagulation parameters (PT 50-100 s, APTT 75-100 s, platelet count (20-50)×10⁹/L, fibrinogen <50 mg/dL)3
Significantly abnormal coagulation parameters, accompanied by severe bleeding or spontaneous bleeding risk; PT or APTT undetectable, platelet < 20×10⁹/L, fibrinogen undetectable, other laboratory results with severe abnormalities such as abnormal venous blood coagulation time4
Nervous systemNo symptoms/signs0
Mild anxiety or fear, headache, fatigue, dizziness, coldness, or abnormal sensation1
Moderate anxiety or fear, headache, fatigue, dizziness, chills, confusion or blurring of consciousness, muscle tremors or fasciculations in the bite area, ptosis of the upper eyelid, and difficulty swallowing2
Severe confusion, lethargy, weakness, paralysis, convulsions, coma, mental disorders, or generalized muscle fasciculations3
KidneyNormal creatinine and urine volume0
Creatinine 1.5-1.9 times the baseline, or creatinine increases by ≥26.5 μmol/L, or urine volume <0.5 mL/(kg·h)for >6 h1
Creatinine 2.0-2.9 times the baseline, or urine volume less than 0.5 mL/(kg·h) for > 12 h2
Creatinine ≥3 times the baseline, creatinine ≥353.6 µmol/L, urine volume <0.3 mL/(kg·h) for >24 h, or anuria ≥12 h, or requiring renal replacement therapy3

The fibrinogen value should be divided according to the reference value of the local hospital; 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa; PT: prothrombin time; APTT: activated partial thromboplastin time.

New window| CSV


Clues of severe poisoning

The assessment of venomous snakebites has obvious time limits. If the time from bite to medical treatment is short, the degree of poisoning is relatively mild. With progression of time, the poisoning may become more serious. The following conditions suggest severe poisoning:[47] (1) snakebite caused by a very dangerous snake species or a snake with a large body; (2) wide distance between teeth, or multiple bites or multiple venomous snake bites; (3) rapid progression and spread of local swelling in the early stage; (4) early occurrence of lymph node swelling and pain, suggesting the spread of snake venom through the lymphatic system; (5) early occurrence of symptoms of systemic toxicity, such as low blood pressure or shock, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, severe headache, heavy eyelid sensation, drowsiness, early ptosis or ophthalmoplegia; (6) early occurrence of spontaneous systemic bleeding; (7) no urine after the snakebite; (8) early appearance of hematuria, brown urine, or black urine.

Format of diagnosis record

Standardization of the format of snakebite diagnosis records can help standardize diagnoses across regions; facilitate the collection, analysis, and electronic retrieval of clinical data; and promote academic exchanges.

Non-venomous snakebite (ICD-10-CM: W59)

For cases where the snake species is clearly identified, directly record the specific snake species and bite site; for cases where the snake species is unclear, directly write “non-venomous snake” and the bite site, which can be recorded as “snakebite (water snake, lateral side of left heel)” or “snakebite (non-venomous snake, lateral side of right heel)”.

Venomous snakebite (ICD-10-CM: T63)

The diagnosis should record the snake species, bite site, and severity. For venomous snakebites with clearly identified snake species, the specific snake species should be recorded directly, such as “venomous snakebite (pit viper, right index finger, severe)”, “venomous snakebite (cobra, right heel inner side, dry bite)”. For venomous snakebites with an unknown snake species, it should be recorded according to the type of toxicity (hemotoxic, neurotoxic, or cytotoxic snake), such as “venomous snakebite (hemotoxic snakes, left thumb, severe)”.

Recommendation 4: It is recommended that medical record documentation be in a standardized snakebite diagnostic format to support real-world research in a digital way (Evidence level A, Recommendation II).

Differential diagnosis

Venomous versus non-venomous snakebites

Owing to the wide variety of snake species, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish whether a snakebite is venomous. Clinically, this distinction is mainly based on local or systemic symptoms, the characteristics of the snake (such as body shape, head shape, teeth, color spots, or body stripes), and other aspects of comprehensive identification. The Cobra family, the Viper family, and a few species of Colubridae, such as the red-necked pit viper and the tiger-spotted pit viper, are highly venomous snakes. Most other snakes are low-toxic or slightly toxic.

Snakebites versus other animal bites

Snakebites can be diagnosed on the basis of the history of witnessing the bite. However, for snakebites that occur at night or under low light conditions, it may be difficult to see the snake causing the injury. Therefore, it is necessary to differentiate it from other common animal bites and stings. First, centipede stings, characterized by 1-2 stings, can appear wedge shaped without chin teeth marks. The wound and injured limb are severely painful, and there may be local inflammatory swelling. In severe cases, there may be tissue necrosis, but most patients have no or mild systemic symptoms. Second, a scorpion can cause a large scorpion-like pincer injury with two stings and local pain, but most patients do not have swelling or redness. If it is a tail sting, there is only one sting and local pain, swelling, and numbness. In severe cases, there may be mild neurological symptoms such as excessive lacrimation and salivation. Third, spider stings mostly cause localized swelling and pain, and in severe cases, they can induce localized small-area necrosis. Generally, there are no systemic symptoms.

SNAKEBITE TREATMENTS

First aid

On-site first aid aims to ensure the safety and physical integrity of snakebite victims, delay toxin absorption, prevent complications, and ensure immediate transport of the victim to a medical center capable of treating snakebites to minimize additional harm. In order not to delay first aid, refer to the protocol for snakebites (Figure 1). The following first aid methods can be used:[1,48-50]

Figure 1.

Figure 1.   Emergency treatment flowchart for snakebites.


Detachment from the scene

Immediately get away from the area where the bite occurred. If a snake holds on, use a stick or other tool to help disengage. If a snakebite occurs in water, immediately transfer the victim to the shore or a boat to prevent drowning due to the onset of toxicity.

Recognizing snakes

It is difficult to identify even the common venomous snakes because of variability due to geographical and environmental factors. Therefore, the person being bitten should try to remember the basic characteristics of the snake, such as its body shape, head shape, body pattern, and color, or take photos of the snake for identification. Do not attempt to kill it to avoid secondary injury.

Calm down

Tension and panic after snakebites tend to aggravate blood circulation and promote toxin absorption. Try to calm down, as some bites are “dry bites”, and toxic symptoms take time to occur. Timely treatment can lead to recovery.

Call for help

The most effective first aid measure after a snakebite is to send the victim to the hospital as soon as possible. Call “120” or the local designated emergency number, and quickly transfer the victim to the nearest medical facility capable of treating snakebites. Do not wait for the appearance of toxic symptoms before sending the victim to the hospital.

Decompression

Decompress and remove the accessories of the injured limb, such as rings, bracelets, watches, anklets, tight sleeves, or pants, to avoid aggravating local injury. The wound can be simply rinsed with clean water.

Immobilization

Activities can promote toxin absorption. After being bitten by a venomous snake, it is recommended to keep the body immobilized, especially the injured limb. A splint or locally available materials can be used to fix the injured limb. The victim should remain seated or reclined, with the injured part or limb in a relatively low position (below the heart level) to reduce the amount of blood returning to the heart and slow down toxin absorption or diffusion.

Bandaging

There is no absolutely safe and effective bandaging method. Pressure immobilization bandages, pressure pads, or pressure ring delay toxin absorption. This method is suitable mainly for neurotoxic snakebites and some hematotoxic snakebites. However, this method should be used with caution for Chinese cobra, Agkistrodon acutus, and other cytotoxic snakebites, as it may aggravate local necrosis.

Pain relief

Local pain is the main symptom of snakebites, and most cases do not require pain relief. For severe cases, acetaminophen or opioid analgesics may be given as appropriate.

Resuscitation

Keep the airway unobstructed. Victims who experience nausea or vomiting should be placed in a lateral or recovery position. In cases of loss of consciousness and respiratory/cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be immediately performed.

Contraindications

The following measures should be avoided for snakebite first aid: picking up or touching a seemingly dead venomous snake with bare hands; waiting for symptoms to occur to determine whether it is a venomous snakebite; using a tourniquet to tie up injured limbs;[51] using a knife to cut the wound (tooth marks); attempting to suck out the toxin; using ice or immersing the wound in ice water; drinking alcohol or coffee to alleviate pain; and treating the wound with cautery.[47,52]

Recommendation 5: “No harm, no delay.” Only non-invasive first aid is recommended on-site, and there should be no delay in transfering the victim to the hospital (Evidence level B, Recommendation II).

Emergency rescue

Priority measures

The assessment and maintenance of vital signs are priority measures for snakebite victims. The priority is to keep the airway unobstructed, maintain breathing and oxygenation, and stabilize circulation, blood pressure, and consciousness. For patients with signs of hypotension or shock, immediate fluid resuscitation (30 mL/kg of crystalloid solution) should be administered to maintain effective circulation. If necessary, vasopressors should be administered to maintain effective perfusion. Neurotoxic snakebite victims are highly prone to respiratory insufficiency, respiratory failure, and even respiratory arrest. ECG monitoring, oxygen therapy, and monitoring of breathing and oxygenation should be performed. In cases of a downward trend in blood oxygen or the occurrence of respiratory distress, supportive treatment, such as endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, should be performed as soon as possible. Treatment should not be easily abandoned for patients with brain death-like conditions, such as a lack of spontaneous breathing, loss of consciousness, and no limb response, and adequate antivenom should be administered with ventilation support. For patients with acute kidney injury or renal failure, correction of coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia and blood purification therapy should be considered to maintain effective blood volume.

General measures

Establish open venous access (to avoid central venous or arterial puncture for patients with severe VICC), and administer lactated Ringer’s solution or normal saline, as appropriate, to maintain effective blood volume balance. Routine blood tests (including blood type), biochemical, coagulation function, (cardiac) muscle enzyme, and liver and kidney function tests should be performed. The patient should be placed in a sitting or reclining position with the injured limb in a low position before antivenom administration. The urine output should be monitored. It is recommended that all asymptomatic patients with venomous snakebites be monitored in a hospital for at least 24 h.

Recommendation 6: Life support is the priority measure for treating venomous snakebites (Evidence level B, Recommendation I).

Use of antivenom

Application principles

Antivenom is the primary treatment for venomous snakebites. Indeed, it is the only safe and effective drug against snake venom. The timing of antivenom administration and its dosage are the most critical decisions in the treatment of venomous snakebites. Owing to the wide variety of venomous snakes, it is impossible to produce antivenom specific to each type of venomous snake. There are currently four types of horse immune single-specific F(ab)2 antivenoms in China (antivenin against Naja atra venom, 1,000 U/vial; antivenin against Bungarus multicinctus venom, 10,000 U/vial; antivenin against Agkistrodon halys venom, 6,000 U/vial; and antivenin against Agkistrodon acutus venom, 2,000 U/vial). The following principles are recommended: “early and adequate dosage, timely addition, homologous specialization, and heterologous combination.”

Recommendation 7: Antivenom is the only safe and effective drug for snake venom (Evidence level A, Recommendation I).

Recommendation 8: The use of antivenom follows the principles of “early and adequate dosage, timely addition, homologous specialization, heterologous combination” (Evidence level B, Recommendation I).

Indications

The classical indications for the use of antivenom include patients with confirmed or suspected snakebites who have at least one of the following systemic or local toxic manifestations.[53] (1) Systemic toxic manifestations: coagulopathy (such as spontaneous bleeding in other parts of the body in addition to bite wounds, decreased platelet count, prolonged BT, decreased fibrinogen, INR >1.2, PT 4-5 s higher than the normal upper limit, and platelet count <10×109/L), neurological toxic manifestations (such as ptosis, external eye muscle paralysis, dilated pupils, muscle weakness or paralysis, and fasciculations), cardiovascular manifestations (such as hypotension, shock, arrhythmia, and abnormal ECG), manifestations of acute kidney injury or renal failure (such as oliguria or anuria, elevated blood urea nitrogen [BUN]/creatinine, black urine or brown urine), and other evidence of intravascular hemolysis (rhabdomyolysis [myalgia or hyperkalemia], hemoglobinuria, or myoglobinuria). (2) Local toxic manifestations: local swelling exceeding half of the bitten limb within 48 h of snakebite; swelling of fingers and toes after bite, with extensive blisters; rapid progression of swelling (such as swelling exceeding the wrist or ankle joint within a few hours of the hand or foot being bitten); swelling of draining lymph nodes after bite; and snakebites caused by local species known to cause necrosis, such as Chinese cobra, Agkistrodon acutus, and Asian cobra.

Snakebite is a time-critical emergency. The antivenom binds to snake venom to exert its anti-toxic effect, and the time of initiation of antivenom treatment is directly related to the prognosis. It is critical to shorten the time from the bite of a venomous snake to the use of antivenom.[54-56] This can reverse VICC, hypotension, and postsynaptic neurotoxicity. Early medication can prevent or limit presynaptic neurotoxicity, rhabdomyolysis, and local tissue necrosis.[13] Delayed use of antivenoms increases the risk of death.[57] Antivenoms are antidotes. Early and sufficient antivenom can effectively prevent subsequent damage from snake venom. The sooner it is used, the less damage the venom causes to the tissue and the better the prognosis.[58] As long as it is confirmed or highly suspected that there is a venomous snakebite with progressive intoxication or abnormal laboratory results, antivenom should be administered immediately without waiting for the onset of typical toxic manifestations. If the amount of antivenom is insufficient, the unneutralized toxins in the tissue can still produce toxic manifestations nearly 200 h or longer after the bite.[59-60] Therefore, if antivenom is not used in sufficient amounts in the early stage, as long as the toxic damage continues, antivenom should still be considered several days or even longer after the bite. Antivenom has been shown to be effective even 17 d after the bite of a venomous snake.[61]

Recommendation 9: The timing of antivenom administration is directly related to the prognosis, and the progressive local or systemic envenomation manifestations is a reliable indication for administering antivenom (Evidence level B, Recommendation I).

Contraindications

There is no absolute contraindication to the use of antivenom, especially for severely toxic patients. Skin tests are effective tools for screening patients with severe immediate reactions and should be performed before the first use of antivenom. Antivenom can be used only if the test is negative. Although antivenom skin tests cannot accurately predict allergic reactions,[47,62] they should be routinely performed before medication. For patients with a positive skin test, antivenom should be administered only when its benefits outweigh the risks. Adrenaline preconditioning might be considered for patients with a positive skin test alone.

Pre-treatment with low-dose adrenaline (0.25 mg via intramuscular injection) before antivenom can safely reduce the risk of adverse reactions in the early stage (within 1 h) and is still effective for up to 48 h.[63-65] However, routine adrenaline pre-treatment is not necessary. Adrenaline pre-treatment should be used cautiously in infants, pregnant women, individuals with altered consciousness, and those with VICC accompanied by meningeal irritation or neurologic localization signs due to the high risk of adverse reactions.[66]

Recommendation 10: There is no absolute contraindication for the use of antivenom for treating venomous snakebites (Evidence level B, Recommendation II).

Variety selection

Homogeneity specificity refers to the use of specific antivenoms for specific venomous snakes, such as using corresponding antivenoms for Bungarus multicinctus, Naja atra, Agkistrodon acutus, and Pallas’s pit viper. Each venomous snake contains different types and levels of toxins, and there are cross-reactions and differences in content between different venomous snakes. The antivenom produced by a particular species of venom-immunized animals also contains multiple antibody components specific to different toxins. The specific antibodies in different varieties of antivenom vary, and there are also cross-reactions between antibody components.[10] Therefore, it is recommended to use a combination of the same or similar toxic antivenoms for bites from venomous snakes for which specific antivenom is not available. For bites from Trimeresurus stejnegeri or Protobothrops acutus, priority should be given to using antivenom against Pallas’ pit viper, followed by antivenom against Agkistrodon acutus or a combination of these. For bites from viper, antivenom against Pallas’ pit viper plus antivenom against Agkistrodon acutus should be used. For bites from Ophiophagus hannah, antivenom against Bungarus multicinctus plus antivenom against Naja atra should be used. For bites from Bungarus multicinctus, antivenom against Bungarus multicinctus plus antivenom against Naja atra should be used. For bites from Naja atra, antivenom against Naja atra should be used. For bites from sea snakes, antivenom against Bungarus multicinctus plus antivenom against Naja atra should be used.

For snakebites with unclear snake species, the antivenom should be selected on the basis of the clinical manifestations of toxicity. For example, for neurotoxic snakebites, venom against bungarus multicinctus should be used. For hematotoxic snakebites, venom against Agkistrodon acutus and/or venom against Agkistrodon acutus should be used. For cytotoxic snakebites, venom against Naja atra and/or venom against Agkistrodon acutus should be used. Do not overemphasize the “correct snake species” and waste the valuable time window for early medication.

Recommendation 11: The use of antivenom depends on toxic manifestations, and overemphasizing the identification of snake species may delay the optimal administration time (Evidence level B, Recommendation II).

Dosage selection

No clinical study can clearly determine the ideal dosage of antivenom, and there is no unified standard around the world. The dosage is mainly determined based on the patient’s condition, guidelines, or clinical experience. The dosage should be determined by clinicians on the basis of differences in snake species, region, severity, and timing of treatment. According to the North American protocol, the initial dose is 4-6 vials, and for cases with potentially fatal injuries, such as shock or severe active bleeding, the initial dose is increased to 8-12 vials. The median initial control dose is nine vials (interquartile range 6-15 vials).[67-68] In China, where monovalent antivenom is available, an initial dose of 2-4 vials seems reasonable on the basis of domestic and overseas experience; the dose can be increased on the basis of the severity of poisoning.[15,47] Appropriately increasing the initial dose may help combat potential snake venom in the blood and is as safe as low initial doses.[69] However, the administration of >5 vials in a single dose can increase the risk of adverse reactions.[62]

In children, the toxin load after a snakebite is comparable to that of adults. Owing to their different physical constitution and smaller blood volume, the blood concentration of toxins in children is higher than that in adults. Therefore, a relatively larger first dose of antivenom may be needed to neutralize the potentially higher toxin load.[33]

Venomous snakebites in pregnant women, while relatively rare, can increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, with a perinatal mortality rate of 5.6%-20.0% (both fetal and neonatal mortality) and a maternal mortality rate of 0-5%.[70-71] Antivenom can counteract or reduce the damage caused by toxins to the mother, thereby reducing the impact on the fetus.[72] Therefore, antivenom is not contraindicated for pregnant women with venomous snakebites, but close maternal and fetal monitoring is required. Fetal heart monitoring should be conducted for at least 8 h and might continue for one week, if feasible.[73]

Recommendation 12: All envenomation patients, regardless of sex, age, or weight, should be administered the same dose of antivenom for the first time (Evidence level B, Recommendation I).

Recommendation 13: Increasing the initial dose of antivenom as appropriate can help achieve initial control quickly and avoid one-time over dosage (Evidence level B, Recommendation II).

Route of administration

The intravenous injection of antivenom can quickly achieve peak blood concentrations, making it the most rapid and effective route for the administration of antivenom. Opening venous access to healthy limbs is more conducive to the rapid entry of antivenom into the blood circulation. For patients with severe coagulopathy, deep venous or arterial puncture should be avoided (which might be considered after improvement of coagulopathy)[74] to prevent severe bleeding. Intravenous injection should be administered slowly (≤2 mL/min); for intravenous infusion, antivenom can be added to 100-250 mL of normal saline and administered within one hour, starting slowly and then quickly (25-50 mL/h for the first 10 min, and the rest quickly dripped). For patients who have undergone local compression fixation or ligation during the visit, the bandage should be removed several minutes after the administration of antivenom. However, for patients with irreversible damage, such as suspected necrosis in the local limb/finger, the bandage should be removed immediately. Antivenom is mostly a large molecular immunoglobulin that is slowly absorbed via intramuscular injection and has low bioavailability.[75] Intramuscular administration may induce local bleeding or hematoma in patients with VICC.[76]

Recommendation 14: Intravenous administration is the preferred method for administering antivenom, and intramuscular injection is not recommended (Evidence level A, Recommendation I).

Monitoring and additional medication

Most acute adverse reactions occur within 1-2 h after the initiation of antivenom treatment. Close monitoring for adverse reactions, focusing on observing the aggravation and amelioration of toxic symptoms, signs, and laboratory indices, is necessary to facilitate the timely administration of additional treatment or calibration of medication. Depending on the severity of envenomation, patients should be monitored at least 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after the first use of antivenom. Blood routine, coagulation function, (cardiac) muscle enzymes, and other laboratory tests should be repeated at 6, 12, and 24 h.[74] After a sufficient neutralizing dose of antivenom is used, the median recovery time for coagulation dysfunction is 6 h.[7,23,77] Therefore, indications for additional medication include persistence of toxic symptoms 6 h after the first dose of antivenom, re-aggravation of coagulation dysfunction after transient recovery, recurrence of bleeding 1-2 h after cessation of bleeding, and continued deterioration of neurological or cardiovascular function for 1 h after the first dose of antivenom.

There are two methods for additional administration: one is on-demand administration, which means that an additional dose is administered based on the progress of envenomation monitored every 6-8 h. If there is no progression of symptoms, there is no need to administer additional doses. The other method is scheduled administration, which means that, regardless of the progress, additional doses (2 doses) are administered every 6-8 h. After three consecutive administrations, additional doses are administered according to the status of patients. For cases of fatal poisoning, shortening the time interval between the first administration and additional administration can be considered, e.g., according to the monitoring results at the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th, and 24th hour. In the case of progression of poisoning, an additional dose can be administered again. After 24 h, an additional dose is administered according to the need.[36]

Recommendation 15: The persistence or worsening of poisoning symptoms is an indication for additional antivenom, with an interval of approximately 6-8 h. The interval between doses can be shortened or extended depending on the severity of the condition (Evidence level B, Recommendation II).

Adverse reactions and treatment

Adverse reactions are inherent reactions to xenogeneic proteins, with wide variability in incidence rates (2.9%-75.0%).[65,78 -79] The incidence rate of adverse reactions to antivenom in China is approximately 4.9%.[80] Negative skin tests do not rule out potential allergic reactions. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare emergency drugs and equipment, such as adrenaline, oxygen, and endotracheal intubation. It is recommended that the first dose of antivenom should be administered in a setting with rescue facilities.

Adverse reactions to antivenom can be classified into three types.[81-82] (1) Anaphylactic reactions, such as rash, urticaria, nausea and vomiting, pain, and even anaphylactic shock, often occur within minutes to several hours after administration, with most occurring within 1-2 h. In severe cases, symptoms such as hypotension or asthma may occur. (2) Allergen reactions, which occur within 1-2 h after administration, manifest as chills, rigors, fever, vascular dilation, and blood pressure drop. Children may develop febrile convulsions. (3) Serum sickness, which occurs 5-20 d (average 7 d) after administration of antivenom, manifests as fever, rash, nausea, vomiting, itching, fatigue, myalgia, joint swelling and pain, and lymphadenopathy.

For management of adverse reactions,[47,83 -84] it is recommended to immediately stop using antivenom and other medications and rapidly inject 500 mL of normal saline (10 mL/kg for children) to maintain an adequate blood volume. Place the patient at a supine position, keep the airway unobstructed, provide high-flow oxygen therapy, and if necessary, provide endotracheal intubation and ventilation support. Adrenaline is the first choice for treating allergic reactions to antivenom. For cardiac and respiratory arrest, rescue procedures comply with the cardiopulmonary resuscitation protocol. For mild cases, administer antihistamines and glucocorticoids; and for those with asthma, give inhalational β-agonists. Treatment of serum sickness mainly involves antihistamines and glucocorticoids; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can be used for pain relief.

Recommendation 16: Adrenaline is the first choice for severe allergic reactions of antivenom (Evidence level A, Recommendation I).

Surgical treatment

Wound treatment

There is no need for wound treatment, or only water local rinse is needed for pre-hospital treatment of venomous snakebites. The purpose of wound debridement in venomous snakebites is to find and remove possible residual broken teeth, clean the wound contamination or infection focus, and remove local necrotic tissue. Most venomous snakebite teeth marks do not require treatment. For example, bites of many-banded kraits, banded kraits, sea snakes, and bamboo snakes do not require wound treatment or only require saline washing at the site of the tooth mark. Only a very small number of snakebites may need debridement. For example, the cytotoxicity of the Chinese cobra can easily cause wound tissue necrosis and infection.[85-87] Other venomous snakebites may require debridement depending on the wound infection or necrosis. For those bitten by simple neurotoxic snakes, a local incision is not necessary.[88] Incision debridement must be considered after using sufficient antivenom. Early sufficient antivenom can prevent tissue damage and reduce intraventricular pressure.[89]

Most cases of snake venom-induced compartment syndrome (SVCS) are caused by direct injection of toxins into muscle tissue. Risk factors for SVCS include venomous snakebites, bites on fingers or toes, the use of ice packs or ice compresses on wounds, insufficient or delayed use of antivenom, and younger children.[90] Only a small number of patients develop acute compartment syndrome (ACS).

Most of the conscious patients with ACS only present with pain and sensory abnormalities; manifestations of arterial ischemia, such as pallor, numbness, and pulselessness, are rare or occur only in the later stages of severe ACS. Therefore, it is not possible to determine compartment syndrome on the basis of “soft signs”, such as local swelling and hardening, disproportionate pain, and stretch pain. The indications for decompression of the SVCS include at least the following four criteria:[1] (1) coagulopathy is corrected or significantly improved; (2) clinical indications consistent with ACS; (3) pressure difference (△P = diastolic pressure - intra-fascial pressure) ≤30 mmHg or absolute pressure in the fascia compartment >40 mmHg; and (4) presence of signs of neurological and/or vascular damage and blood flow impairment. △P>30 mmHg can be used as an exclusion criterion for SVCS.[91]

For patients with SVCS, in whom SVCS is not relieved after sufficient antivenom, incision and decompression are reasonable.[92] However, it should not be performed as a preventive measure,[93] as an incision increases the risk of bleeding, neurovascular or tendon injury, and infection and may even aggravate local muscle necrosis, prolong hospitalization time, and increase hospitalization costs. In addition, it may also cause wound scar formation, fibrosis, and surgical accident-induced nerve or vascular injury or lead to long-term adverse effects such as impaired physical function, unaesthetic appearance, pain, or sensory disturbance.[94-95]

Recommendation 17: Surgical intervention should be considered after adequate dose of antivenom, and it is recommended for wound infection, necrosis, residual teeth, and SVCS (Evidence level B, Recommendation I).

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)

NPWT, also known as vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) or vacuum-assisted wound closure (VAC), entails the use of a closed negative pressure treatment system that provides subatmospheric pressure to acute and chronic open wounds. The system consists of a polyurethane foam sponge, a semiocclusive barrier, a liquid collection system, and a negative pressure pump. NPWT promotes wound healing by promoting tissue deformation, drainage of extracellular inflammatory fluid, stabilization of the wound environment, and micro-deformation.[95-96] It is an effective treatment for acute and chronic wounds such as diabetic foot ulcers, pressure ulcers, chronic wounds, and skin grafts.[97-101] However, several high-quality studies have shown that NPWT is not superior to standard therapy and may even cause more complications,[102-105] such as toxic shock syndrome, infection, pain, bleeding, adjacent tissue ischemia, and hemodynamic instability.[89]

Small-scale clinical studies of NWPT for venomous snakebite wounds suggest that it can reduce wound necrosis, infection rates, and edema,[106-109] but there is a potential risk of complications. Therefore, further evidence is required to establish the effectiveness and safety of NPWT for the treatment of venomous snakebite wounds. Based on the available evidence, for the wound treatment of cytolytic venomous snakes (such as the Chinese cobra), this treatment option might be considered after sufficient use of antivenoms for a short period (<7 d).

Recommendation 18: Negative pressure wound therapy can be considered for the late-stage treatment of wounds in cytotoxic snakebite patients (Evidence level B, Recommendation II).

Pain relief and swelling subsidence

Pain relief

Timely relief of pain is an important symptomatic treatment for snakebites. Currently, there are two main types of analgesics: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids. NSAIDs can inhibit platelet aggregation and affect blood coagulation, which increases the risk of bleeding in patients with hematotoxic snakebites. Acetaminophen is an NSAID that inhibits the synthesis of prostaglandins in the central nervous system and blocks the impulse of pain nerve endings, resulting in analgesic effects.[110] Opioid analgesics produce strong analgesic effects by acting on opioid receptors in the central nervous system, but excessive or prolonged use can lead to respiratory depression, gastrointestinal reactions, and drug dependence.[110]

Swelling subsidence

After using sufficient amounts of antivenom, providing positional drainage can facilitate the reabsorption of fluid in the tissue space of the swollen area, thereby reducing local pressure, relieving swelling, and alleviating swelling-related pain. The swelling of the affected limb can be reduced by elevating it not lower than the sternal angle.[1,111]

Blister treatment

Various hemotoxic and cytotoxic snakebites can produce local tension blisters or blood blisters. High-tension bullae are at risk of rupture or tearing and secondary infection, delaying wound healing. A sterile syringe can be used to aspirate the blister fluid in a low-lying position, or a microincision can be made to promote the outflow of the blister fluid. After the blister fluid is released, it can be lightly compressed with sterile gauze to avoid the recurrence of the blister. In cases of suspected infection of the blister fluid, it should be sent for culture to facilitate the timely detection of pathogenic bacteria and the use of appropriate antibiotics.[1]

Infection prevention and treatment

Antibiotic use

Multiple aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive or Gram-negative pathogenic microorganisms are found in viper oral flora cultures.[112-113] The reported incidence of secondary bacterial infection in venomous snakebite wounds (10.3%-47.5%)[114-116] is much higher than that in non-venomous snakebite wounds.[114] The infection rate in Chinese cobra bite wounds can be as high as 80.9%.[117] However, there is no need for routine infection prevention after snakebites. Once infected, approximately 68% of wounds require surgical intervention.[117] Anti-infection treatment is only suitable for patients with localized or suspected infections (such as abscess formation, increased wound secretion or odor, cellulitis, or positive microbial culture of secretions) or patients with localized tissue necrosis/gangrene.[13] Patients with confirmed infections should be administered anti-infection treatment promptly to prevent or ameliorate local tissue necrosis, systemic infection, and sepsis.[118] Patients with high fibrinogen, elevated alanine aminotransferase or C-reactive protein levels, and severe poisoning are at an increased risk of wound infection.[119] Common pathogens include Morganella, Enterococcus, Bacteroides fragilis, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus. Empirical anti-infection treatment options include amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, fluoroquinolones, cefazolin, third-generation antibiotics against spore-forming bacteria, and aminoglycosides.[120-122] Antimicrobial agents should be used based on clinical findings and drug sensitivity results.

Tetanus prevention

Tetanus is a bacterial infection caused by Clostridium tetani, which typically invades the body through skin wounds or mucous membranes. While venomous (or non-venomous) snakebites are unlikely to cause tetanus, there is a potential risk due to the relatively thin teeth of venomous snakes and the potential presence of clostridia in the oral cavity of snakes, which can contaminate the wound.[123-125] Given the serious risk of tetanus, it is essential to implement routine tetanus prophylaxis for both venomous and non-venomous snakebites. Note that tetanus antitoxin or immunoglobulin should be administered separately from antivenom (usually administered after antivenom) because of the risk of allergic reactions. The interval should be at least one hour to avoid adverse reactions. After administration, patients should be closely monitored for potential adverse reactions.

Recommendation 19: Routine anti-infection treatment is not necessary for snakebites, and antibiotics are required only if there are signs of necrosis or infection (Evidence level A, Recommendation I).

Recommendation 20: Routine tetanus prevention should be carried out after snakebite (Evidence level B, Recommendation I).

Glucocorticoids

Glucocorticoids have an inhibitory effect on the inflammatory response. They attenuate or prevent inflammatory exudation, edema, and inflammatory cell infiltration during the acute inflammatory phase by directly constricting small blood vessels, inhibiting vasodilatation and fluid exudation, and inhibiting the effects of inflammatory cell aggregation and the release of oxygen free radicals from neutrophils.[110] A small-scale study has shown that adequate amounts of antivenom supplemented with short-term, low-dose oral steroids can help improve swelling and pain.[126] However, a randomized controlled trial has shown that glucocorticoids do not reduce limb swelling.[127] Glucocorticoids should not be routinely used for swelling reduction in venomous snakebites unless they are used for serum sickness or snake venom-associated adrenal insufficiency.

Anticholinesterase drugs

Neurotoxins produce myocardial paralytic effects by inhibiting the release of acetylcholine from the presynaptic membrane or by binding to acetylcholine receptors on the postsynaptic membrane. Anticholinesterase drugs such as neostigmine or pyridostigmine can inhibit acetylcholinesterase activity, reduce the hydrolysis of acetylcholine in the synaptic gap, and exert a complete cholinesteroid effect, which produces an excitatory effect on skeletal muscle and has a certain degree of efficacy in the reversal of some types of neurotoxin-induced myocardial paralysis.[128-130] However, these methods are ineffective against presynaptic membrane toxins such as those produced by Bungarus caeruleus.[131] Neostigmine or pyridostigmine 0.02 mg/kg (0.04 mg/kg in children) is administered intramuscularly, with 0.5-2.5 mg repeated for 1-3 h if necessary, with the total daily dose not exceeding 10 mg. Because of the risk of increased airway secretions with neostigmine, 0.6 mg of atropine sulfate (50 μg/kg in children) may be administered intravenously prior to the medication.[47] Such medications should not delay the administration of antivenom and necessary tracheal intubation.

Recommendation 21: Anticholinesterase drugs are indicated only for patients with neurotoxic snakebites in whom antivenom is not effective (Evidence level B, Recommendation II).

Other treatments

Blood products

Snake venom-induced consumptive coagulopathy or coagulopathy is a severe reaction after a venomous snakebite, and the efficacy of blood products is highly controversial. A multicenter randomized controlled trial has shown that fresh frozen plasma, which is used as an adjunct to antivenom, can accelerate the recovery of coagulation function but does not shorten the length of hospital stay and that early (<8 h) administration may be less effective.[132] A retrospective study has shown that fresh frozen plasma may accelerate the recovery of coagulation function and reduce bleeding and the amount of antivenom needed.[133] However, fresh frozen plasma was not found to accelerate the recovery of coagulation function in patients with viper bites.[134] Recent studies have shown that fresh frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate do not improve coagulation function,[135] and do not ameliorate coagulation disorders in those without bleeding.[136] Therefore, blood products such as fresh frozen plasma or cryoprecipitate should not be routinely used for venomous snakebites accompanied by VICC, but they can be considered adjuvant therapies for patients with severe coagulopathy who require emergency surgery, invasive procedures, those with insufficient antivenom usage, or those who have active bleeding. A variety of snake venom enzyme components can inhibit or activate platelets, producing antiplatelet or platelet aggregation effects.[137] Using sufficient antivenom can rapidly restore platelet levels, and platelet transfusion can be considered for those with severe thrombocytopenia with bleeding or those who require emergency surgery.

Blood purification therapy

Plasma exchange, which entails separation and discarding of plasma to remove large molecules from the blood, may help remove large molecules of free snake venom from the blood.[138] A small-scale study has shown that plasma exchange can help remove snake venom from the body.[139] The efficacy of plasma exchange in treating snake venom-related thrombotic microvascular disease is uncertain.[140-143]

Snake venom-related ophthalmia

The neck glands of venom-spraying cobras, Chinese cobras, and Rhabdophis tigrinus can spray toxins. If toxins are sprayed into the eyes, they can cause severe pain, photophobia, lacrimation, blurred vision, other irritating symptoms, and even corneal ulcers and secondary endophthalmitis.[144] Immediate low-pressure irrigation with large amounts of water is required at the scene, followed by thorough irrigation with normal saline or lactated Ringer’s solution after arrival at the hospital. Topical application of 0.5% adrenaline drops or 4% lidocaine eye drops can be used for pain relief. Ophthalmologic examination is required to assess corneal damage, and topical antibiotic drops such as chloramphenicol, tetracycline, or ciprofloxacin can be administered to prevent intraocular or corneal opacities. In principle, antivenom is not necessary, but for those with severe eye damage or signs of toxin absorption in the early stages, antivenom should be administered. Glucocorticoids are contraindicated because of the risk of herpes simplex keratitis.[47,145]

Recommendation 22: Snake venom-related ophthalmia requires immediate administration of large amounts of low-pressure water for rinsing (Evidence level B, Recommendation I).

Traditional Chinese medicine treatment

Traditional Chinese medicine has a long history of treating venomous snakebites. The oral and external administration of Chinese medicine, as well as acupuncture and cupping, could improve local and systemic symptoms and enhance therapeutic effects.[146] According to traditional Chinese medicine theory, the basic pathogenesis of snakebite toxicity is the lack of discharge of snake venom and the internalization of the toxin.[147] Snakebites are divided into three types: “wind toxins”, “fire toxins”, and “wind-fire toxins”. According to the syndrome type and clinical manifestations, the treatment of snakebites is based on the identification and application of methods for clearing away heat and detoxification, dispelling wind and opening up orifices, cooling the blood and stopping hemorrhage, and promoting diuresis and catharsis.[148] Alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols, and other active ingredients in some proprietary traditional Chinese medicine snakebite detoxification preparations have a certain inhibitory effect on enzyme snake venom components such as PLA2 and protein hydrolase.[149-150] Some traditional Chinese medicines have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, which can help reduce swelling.[1] For ulcers caused by snakebites, in addition to sufficient antivenom and local debridement, traditional Chinese medicine that promote pus removal, tissue regeneration, and wound healing can be administered as adjunctive treatments.[151,152]A large-sample meta-analysis indicated that traditional Chinese medicines used for the treatment of pit viper bites can improve local symptoms and reduce swelling,[153] but more robust studies are required to confirm the reliability of the conclusions.

Psychological disorders associated with snakebites

The incidence of psychological disorders in snakebite victims ranges from 8% to 43%, mainly post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, hysteria (or unspecified affective dissociative and conversion disorders), paranoia (or organic delusions or schizophrenia-like disorders), psychosocial disorders, hallucinations, acute psychosis, psychogenic convulsions, inattention, and aggressive behavior.[153] Most patients experience gradual remission as they recover from snakebites, and nearly 1/3 of patients may experience persistent symptoms for more than one year or even up to several years.[154-155] Psychological intervention is the main treatment, including psychological first aid (e.g., caring, listening, or soothing), psychoeducation, and cognitive-behavioral therapy.[156-157] Psychopharmacological medications, such as antidepressants, are administered when necessary.[158]

PREVENTION OF SNAKEBITES

Nearly 5.8 billion people worldwide are at risk of being bitten by venomous snakes, predominantly in tropical and subtropical regions.[159] Snakebite prevention is the most important and cost-effective way to minimize the burden of snakebites. The main preventive measures are summarized below: strengthening the medical and health system, expanding the coverage of snakebite treatment in at-risk areas, and improving and standardizing snakebite treatment in medical institutions.[160]

Enhancing community awareness regarding the prevention of snakebites, especially in high-risk communities. Students should be educated about snake habits and potential injuries, avoid close contact with snakes, and be trained in first aid related to snakebites.[160] Utilize mainstream or social media to raise awareness of the lifestyle of snake and potential harm caused by snakebites. As snakes are thermophiles, they are most active at temperatures of 26-34 °C. Snakes are more active from April to October, and the lower the temperature is, the less their activity. Snakes prepare for hibernation when the temperature is consistently below 15 °C. At temperatures exceeding 40%, snakes tend to find refuge in caves, rock crevices, bushes, or under dead trees and weeds to avoid heat. Snakes prefer warmer climates and are mostly diurnal (day-time hunters). For example, cobras and king cobra are more active during the daytime (09:00-15:00); gold-ringed snakes/silver-ringed snakes tend to be more active between 18:00-22:00; and the Medog green pit viper, pit viper, Agkistrodon acutus, Viperidae, pointed-scaled pit viper are often active in the morning and evening. Understanding their activity patterns can reduce the chance of encounters and consequently bites.

Maintaining a clean environment, including cleaning up the dead leaves and weeds surrounding the house, is important. On encountering a snake, one should avoid provoking it. Usually, a snake’s attack range is approximately half of its body length, averaging 0.30-0.60 m. A few venomous snakes, such as Chinese cobras, spraying cobras, and cervical groove snakes, can spray venom several times up to a distance of 1.0-2.5 m.[1]

Long pants and boots should be worn when walking or working in grass, wood, or snake habitats. One should be aware of snakes lurking when moving or clearing jumbled piles of wood, dead branches, leaves, or rubble. One should be particularly aware of snakes in shallow, marsh, shoreline, and grassy areas.

Individuals engaged in snake-related industries and field workers should be given pre-employment training in snakebite prevention. They should follow standard operating procedures and be equipped with protective gear such as anti-bite gloves and boots. Individuals camping in wild habitats should be advised to rest in an open, dry place free of branches or weeds and not in caves or under the shade of trees. Tents should be tightly closed to avoid snakes burrowing at night.

If bitten by a snake, measures such as cauterization, incision, and sucking should be avoided at the scene to prevent potential injuries.[13] The patient should be promptly taken to a hospital capable of treating snakebites.

Funding: This study was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (82160647), Hainan Clinical Medical Research Center Project (LCYX202310), Hainan Provincial Major Science and Technology Projects (ZDKJ202004), and CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences ( 2019-I2M-5-023).

Ethical approval: Not needed.

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Contributors: RDL (Rongde Lai), SJY (Shijiao Yan), SJW (Shijun Wang), SQY (Shuqing Yang), ZRY (Zhangren Yan), PL (Pin Lan), YGW (Yonggao Wang), QL (Qi Li), JLW (Jinlong Wang), and WW (Wei Wang) contributed equally to this work and are co-first authors. The listed authors meet the journal’s specific requirements regarding the duties and responsibilities of authorship.

Expert Committee (in alphabetical order by surname)

Wenkai Bin (Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, University of South China), Chenglou Cao (the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of CM), Chunshui Cao (the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University), Jiao Chen (Hainan Medical University), Song Chen (People’s Hospital of Wanning), Yueming Chen (Central People’s Hospital of Zhanjiang), Wei Chong (the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University), Ying Deng (the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University), Lingxin Ding (the People’s Hospital of Nanchuan Chongqing), Qingqing Dou (Shenzhen Bao’an People’s Hospital), Junkai Du (the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University), Xizhen Fan (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Lu Feng (Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences/Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital), Geng Guo (the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University), Xiaotong Han (Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital), Wei Han (Qingdao Municipal Hospital [Group]), Heyu He (Ledong Li Autonomous County People’s Hospital), Xiaojun He (Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine), Xiangui He (Wangmo County People’s Hospital), Liang Huang (the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University), Xiaoliang Ji (Huzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Jiang Wei (Deyang People’s Hospital), Rongde Lai (the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University), Pin Lan (the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University/Lishui Central Hospital/Lishui Hospital of Zhejiang University), Dezhong Li (the Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture), Qi Li (Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University), Qiang Li (Jiangjin Hospital of TCM), Xiaomin Li (the First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang), Yongwu Li (Xiamen Fifth Hospital), Qibin Li (the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University), Xin Li (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences/Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital), Xiangmin Li (Xiangya Hospital of Central South University), Yi Li (Peking Union Medical College Hospital), Qiqing Lin (Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities), Jiyan Lin (the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University), Qing Liang (the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University), Zijing Liang (the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University), Bin Liu (Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University), Chuanzhu Lyu (Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences/Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital), Shouxu Lyu (Heilongjiang Red Cross Sengong General Hospital), Yuefeng Ma (the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Yanhong Ouyang (Hainan Cenertal Hospital), Xianfeng Pan (the 920th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force), Qingsheng Peng (Yichun Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Xianquan Song (Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital), Chang Su (Hainan Medical University), Mingwei Sun (Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences/Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital), Ping Tan (Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital), Zhongzhi Tang (General Hospital of the Central Theater of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army), Youping Wang (the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University), Jinlong Wang (Chongqing University Fuling Hospital, Chongqing University), Shijun Wang (the Affiliated People’s Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Wei Wang (the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University), Yonggao Wang (the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University), Jianbo Wu (the Second Hospital of the Navy of the Southern Theater of the People’s Liberation Army), Tiejun Wu (Liuyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Haiying Wu (First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Tao Xiang (the Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu), Aihua Xu (Pucheng County Snake Wound Prevention and Control Hospital), Baoling Xu (the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University), Ping Xu (Zigong Fourth People’s Hospital), Shuyun Xu (West China Hospital of Sichuan University), Yong Xu (Tongren People’s Hospital), Zhangren Yan (Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine), Shijiao Yan (Hainan Medical University), Shuqing Yang (Chongqing University Central Hospital/Chongqing Emergency Medical Center), Xiaoping Yang (Longhui People’s Hospital), Xuewei Yang (the People’s Hospital of Nanchuan Chongqing), Yongkun Yao (the 927th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army), Xuezhong Yu (Peking Union Medical College Hospital), Xiaogang Yu (Yichang Central People’s Hospital), Anyong Yu (Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University), Jun Zeng (Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences/Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital), Chunyang Zhang (Affiliated Central Hospital of Shenyang Medical College), Guobin Zhang (the First Affiliated Hospital of Shaoyang University), Guoqiang Zhang (China-Japan Friendship Hospital), Jianfeng Zhang (Wuming Hospital of Guangxi Medical University), Leibing Zhang (Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital), Mao Zhang (the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Silong Zhang (Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine), Wenwu Zhang (Shenzhen Bao’an People’s Hospital), Xinchao Zhang (National Geriatrics Center of Beijing Hospital), Yanan Zhang (Longyan First Hospital), Yongbiao Zhang (the Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University), Xiaodong Zhao (the Fourth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital), Donglin Zhou (General Hospital of Pingxiang Mining Group co.), Ning Zhou (Central People’s Hospital of Zhanjiang), Qunhui Zhou (Shuangpai County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Honghai Zhu (the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University People’s Zhaoqing Hospital), Huadong Zhu (Peking Union Medical College Hospital), Gang Zhao (Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology).

Reference

Lai RD. Diagnosis and treatment of snakebite. Beijing: Scientific and Technical documentation press. 2023; 6-7,45,95- 96, 149,161-164,198-202,211.

[Cited within: 12]

WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization. Guidelines for the production, control and regulation of snake antivenom immunoglobulins. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/snake-antivenom-immunoglobulins-annex-5-trs-no-1004

URL     [Cited within: 2]

Pucca MB, Knudsen C, Oliveira IS, Rimbault C, Cerni FA, Wen FH, et al.

Current knowledge on snake dry bites

Toxins (Basel). 2020 ;12(11): 668.

[Cited within: 2]

Warrell DA, Williams DJ.

Clinical aspects of snakebite envenoming and its treatment in low-resource settings

Lancet. 2023 ;401(10385): 1382-98.

[Cited within: 1]

The Lancet.

Snake-bite envenoming: a priority neglected tropical disease

Lancet. 2017 ;390(10089): 2.

[Cited within: 1]

GBD Snakebite Envenomation Collaborators.

Global mortality of snakebite envenoming between 1990 and 2019

Nat Commun. 2022 ;13(1): 6160.

[Cited within: 1]

Farrar J, Hotez P, Junghanss T, Kang G, Lalloo D, White N.

Manson’s tropical diseases

Indian Med Gaz. 1914;49: 364-5.

[Cited within: 2]

Sanhajariya S, Duffull SB, Isbister GK.

Pharmacokinetics of snake venom

Toxins (Basel). 2018 ;10(2): 73.

[Cited within: 1]

Oliveira AL, Viegas MF, da Silva SL, Soares AM, Ramos MJ, Fernandes PA.

The chemistry of snake venom and its medicinal potential

Nat Rev Chem. 2022 ;6(7): 451-69.

[Cited within: 3]

Casewell NR, Jackson TNW, Laustsen AH, Sunagar K.

Causes and consequences of snake venom variation

Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2020 ;41(8): 570-81.

[Cited within: 2]

Brent J, Burkhart K, Dargan P, Hatten B, Megarbane B, Palmer R, et al.

Critical care toxicology: Diagnosis and management of the critically poisoned patient

Crit Care Toxicol Diagn Manag Crit Poisoned Patient. 2017: 3-27.

[Cited within: 1]

Tan CH.

Snake venomics: fundamentals, recent updates, and a look to the next decade

Toxins. 2022 ;14(4): 247.

[Cited within: 2]

Gutiérrez JM, Calvete JJ, Habib AG, Harrison RA, Williams DJ, Warrell DA.

Snakebite envenoming

Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3: 17063.

[Cited within: 4]

Tasoulis T, Isbister GK.

A current perspective on snake venom composition and constituent protein families

Arch Toxicol. 2023 ;97(1):133-53.

[Cited within: 1]

Tan CH, Tan NH. Toxicology of snake venoms. London: Springer Nature. 2017;3-45.

[Cited within: 6]

Murakami M, Sato H, Taketomi Y.

Updating phospholipase A2 biology

Biomolecules. 2020 ;10(10):1457.

[Cited within: 1]

Olaoba OT, Karina Dos Santos P, Selistre-de-Araujo HS, Ferreira de Souza DH.

Snake venom metalloproteinases (SVMPs): a structure-function update

Toxicon X. 2020;7:100052.

[Cited within: 1]

Kini RM, Doley R.

Structure, function and evolution of three-finger toxins: mini proteins with multiple targets

Toxicon. 2010 ;56(6): 855-67.

[Cited within: 1]

Bickler PE.

Amplification of snake venom toxicity by endogenous signaling pathways

Toxins. 2020 ;12(2): 68.

[Cited within: 1]

Lu Q, Clemetson JM, Clemetson KJ.

Snake venoms and hemostasis

J Thromb Haemost. 2005 ;3(8):1791-9.

[Cited within: 1]

White J.

Snake venoms and coagulopathy

Toxicon. 2005 ;45(8): 951-67.

[Cited within: 1]

Bickler PE, Abouyannis M, Bhalla A, Lewin MR.

Neuromuscular weakness and paralysis produced by snakebite envenoming: mechanisms and proposed standards for clinical assessment

Toxins. 2023 ;15(1): 49.

[Cited within: 1]

Warrell DA.

Snake bite

Lancet. 2010 ;375(9708): 77-88.

[Cited within: 2]

Ranawaka UK, Lalloo DG, de Silva HJ.

Neurotoxicity in snakebite—the limits of our knowledge

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 ;7(10): e2302.

[Cited within: 1]

Kumar M, Arcot Thanjan M, Gopalakrishnan N, Jeyachandran D, Thanigachalam D, Ramanathan S.

Snake envenomation-induced acute kidney injury: prognosis and long-term renal outcomes

Postgrad Med J. 2022 ;98(1158): 264-8.

[Cited within: 1]

Liblik K, Byun J, Saldarriaga C, Perez GE, Lopez-Santi R, Wyss FQ, et al.

Snakebite envenomation and heart: systematic review

Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 ;47(9): 100861.

[Cited within: 2]

Péterfi O, Boda F, Szabó Z, Ferencz E, Bába L.

Hypotensive snake venom components-a mini-review

Molecules. 2019 ;24(15): 2778.

[Cited within: 2]

Kini RM, Koh CY.

Snake venom three-finger toxins and their potential in drug development targeting cardiovascular diseases

Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;181:114105.

[Cited within: 1]

Anonymous A.

Joint trauma system clinical practice guideline: global snake envenomation management

J Spec Oper Med. 2020 ;20(2): 43-74.

[Cited within: 1]

Weinstein SA, Warrell DA, Keyler DE. “Venomous” bites from “non-venomous” snakes. Frisco: Elsevier Inc., 2022; 41-80.

[Cited within: 1]

Silva A, Hodgson WC, Isbister GK.

Antivenom for neuromuscular paralysis resulting from snake envenoming

Toxins. 2017 ;9(4): 143.

[Cited within: 1]

Suhita R, Begum I, Rashid M, Chandran VP, Shastri SA, Kantamneni R, et al.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of global prevalence of neurotoxic and hemotoxic snakebite envenomation

East Mediterr Health J. 2022 ;28(12): 909-16.

[Cited within: 1]

Seifert SA, Armitage JO, Sanchez EE.

Snake envenomation

N Engl J Med. 2022;386:68-78.

[Cited within: 2]

von Keudell AG, Weaver MJ, Appleton PT, Bae DS, Dyer GSM, Heng M, et al.

Diagnosis and treatment of acute extremity compartment syndrome

Lancet. 2015 ;386(10000): 1299-310.

[Cited within: 1]

Sarkar S, Sinha R, Chaudhury AR, Maduwage K, Abeyagunawardena A, Bose N, et al.

Snake bite associated with acute kidney injury

Pediatr Nephrol. 2021 ;36(12):3829-40.

[Cited within: 1]

Chu ER, Weinstein SA, White J, Warrell DA.

Venom ophthalmia caused by venoms of spitting elapid and other snakes: Report of ten cases with review of epidemiology, clinical features, pathophysiology and management

Toxicon. 2010 ;56(3): 259-72.

[Cited within: 2]

Expert consensus group on diagnosis and treatment of acute hemorrhagic coagulation disorder.

Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of acute hemorrhagic coagulation disorder

Chin J Emerg Med. 2020 ;29(6):780-7.

[Cited within: 1]

Burton AG, Jandrey KE.

Use of thromboelastography in clinical practice

Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2020 ;50(6): 1397-409.

[Cited within: 1]

Leffers P, Ferreira J, Sollee D, Schauben J.

Thromboelastography in the management of snakebite-induced coagulopathy: a case series and literature review

Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2018 ;29(7): 656-60.

[Cited within: 1]

Lamb T, Abouyannis M, de Oliveira SS, Shenoy KR, Geevar T, Zachariah A, et al.

The 20-minute whole blood clotting test (20WBCT) for snakebite coagulopathy-a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 ;15(8): e0009657.

[Cited within: 1]

Tianyi FL, Hamza M, Abubakar SB, Al Solaiss J, Trelfa A, Abdullahi HL, et al.

Diagnostic characteristics of the 20-minute whole blood clotting test in detecting venom-induced consumptive coagulopathy following carpet viper envenoming

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 ;17(6): e0011442.

[Cited within: 1]

Medeiros CR, Brioschi ML, Souza SN, Teixeira MJ.

Infrared thermography to diagnose and manage venomous animal bites and stings

Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2017 ;50(2): 260-4.

[Cited within: 1]

Sabitha P, Bammigatti C, Deepanjali S, Suryanarayana BS, Kadhiravan T.

Point-of-care infrared thermal imaging for differentiating venomous snakebites from non-venomous and dry bites

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 ;15(2): e0008580.

[Cited within: 1]

Carter RW, Gerardo CJ, Samuel SP, Kumar S, Kotehal SD, Mukherjee PP, et al.

The BRAVO clinical study protocol: oral varespladib for inhibition of secretory phospholipase A 2 in the treatment of snakebite envenoming

Toxins. 2022 ;15(1): 22.

[Cited within: 1]

Dart RC, Hurlbut KM, Garcia R, Boren J.

Validation of a severity score for the assessment of crotalid snakebite

Ann Emerg Med. 1996 ;27(3): 321-6.

[Cited within: 1]

Nishioka SA.

Limitations of the snakebite severity score

Ann Emerg Med. 1996 ;28(3): 371-2.

[Cited within: 1]

World Health Organization. Guidelines for the management of snakebites. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789290225300

URL     [Cited within: 7]

Parker-Cote J, Meggs WJ.

First aid and pre-hospital management of venomous snakebites

Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018 ;3(2): 45.

[Cited within: 1]

Avau B, Borra V, Vandekerckhove P, De Buck E.

The treatment of snake bites in a first aid setting: a systematic review

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 ;10(10): e0005079.

[Cited within: 1]

World Health Organization. Control of neglected tropical diseases. Available at: https://www.who.int/teams/controlof-neglected-tropical-diseases/snakebite-envenoming/treatment

URL     [Cited within: 1]

Yang Q, Gao YH, Fu WJ, Ma SY.

Impact of tourniquet use on severity of snakebite envenoming in Chongqing, China: a single-center retrospective study

J Int Med Res. 2024 ;52(1): 3000605231225540.

[Cited within: 1]

Yanamandra U, Yanamandra S.

Traditional first aid in a case of snake bite: more harm than good

BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014: bcr2013202891.

[Cited within: 1]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Venomous snake bites: symptoms & first aid. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/snakes/symptoms.html

URL     [Cited within: 1]

Feitosa EL, Sampaio VS, Salinas JL, Queiroz AM, da Silva IM, Gomes AA, et al.

Older age and time to medical assistance are associated with severity and mortality of snakebites in the Brazilian Amazon: a case-control study

PLoS One. 2015 ;10(7): e0132237.

[Cited within: 1]

Isbister GK.

Antivenom availability, delays and use in Australia

Toxicon X. 2022;17: 100145.

[Cited within: 1]

Johnston CI, Ryan NM, O’Leary MA, Brown SG, Isbister GK.

Australian taipan (Oxyuranus spp.) envenoming: clinical effects and potential benefits of early antivenom therapy - Australian Snakebite Project (ASP-25)

Clin Toxicol. 2017 ;55(2): 115-22.

[Cited within: 1]

Habib AG, Abubakar SB.

Factors affecting snakebite mortality in north-eastern Nigeria

Int Health. 2011 ;3(1): 50-5.

[Cited within: 1]

Jayaraman T, Dhanasinghu R, Kuppusamy S, Gaur A, Sakthivadivel V.

Bite-to-needle time - an extrapolative indicator of repercussion in patients with snakebite

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 ;26(11):1175-8.

[Cited within: 1]

Seifert SA, Boyer LV.

Recurrence phenomena after immunoglobulin therapy for snake envenomations: Part 1. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of immunoglobulin antivenoms and related antibodies

Ann Emerg Med. 2001 ;37(2):189-95.

[Cited within: 1]

Seifert SA, Mascarenas DN, Fullerton L, Warrick BJ, Smolinske SC.

Unpredicted late-, new-onset thrombocytopenia and hypofibrinogenemia in Fab antivenom-treated rattlesnake envenomation

Toxicon. 2020;184:55-56.

[Cited within: 1]

Chen QX, Lai RD, Liang ZJ.

One case of re-recurrence of poisoning symptoms in Chinese cobra bite with literature review

Chinese Emergency Medicine. 2022 ;42(6):511-3.

[Cited within: 1]

Chuang PC, Chang KW, Cheng FJ, Wu MH, Tsai MT, Li CJ.

Risk factors associated with snake antivenom reaction and the role of skin test

Acta Trop. 2020;203: 105293.

[Cited within: 2]

Premawardhena AP, de Silva CE, Fonseka MM, Gunatilake SB, de Silva HJ.

Low dose subcutaneous adrenaline to prevent acute adverse reactions to antivenom serum in people bitten by snakes: randomised, placebo-controlled trial

BMJ. 1999 ;318(7190): 1041-3.

[Cited within: 1]

Williams DJ, Jensen SD, Nimorakiotakis B, Müller R, Winkel KD.

Antivenom use, premedication and early adverse reactions in the management of snake bites in rural Papua New Guinea

Toxicon. 2007 ;49(6): 780-92.

[Cited within: 1]

de Silva HA, Pathmeswaran A, Ranasinha CD, Jayamanne S, Samarakoon SB, Hittharage A, et al.

Low-dose adrenaline, promethazine, and hydrocortisone in the prevention of acute adverse reactions to antivenom following snakebite: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

PLoS Med. 2011 ;8(5): e1000435.

[Cited within: 2]

Habib AG.

Effect of pre-medication on early adverse reactions following antivenom use in snakebite: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Drug Saf. 2011 ;34(10): 869-80.

[Cited within: 1]

Lavonas EJ, Ruha AM, Banner W, Bebarta V, Bernstein JN, Bush SP, et al.

Unified treatment algorithm for the management of crotaline snakebite in the United States: results of an evidence-informed consensus workshop

BMC Emerg Med. 2011;11: 2.

[Cited within: 1]

Corbett B, Clark RF.

North American snake envenomation

Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2017 ;35(2): 339-54.

[Cited within: 1]

Alirol E, Sharma SK, Ghimire A, Poncet A, Combescure C, Thapa C, et al.

Dose of antivenom for the treatment of snakebite with neurotoxic envenoming: evidence from a randomised controlled trial in Nepal

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 ;11(5): e0005612.

[Cited within: 1]

Langley RL.

Snakebite during pregnancy: a literature review

Wilderness Environ Med. 2010 ;21(1): 54-60.

[Cited within: 1]

Nascimento TP, Vilhena Silva-Neto A, Baia-da-Silva DC, da Silva Balieiro PC, Baleiro AADS, Sachett J, et al.

Pregnancy outcomes after snakebite envenomations: a retrospective cohort in the Brazilian Amazonia

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 ;16(12): e0010963.

[Cited within: 1]

Palmeira P, Quinello C, Silveira-Lessa AL, Zago CA, Carneiro-Sampaio M.

IgG placental transfer in healthy and pathological pregnancies

Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012: 985646.

[Cited within: 1]

Mattison D, Halbert LA. Clinical pharmacology during pregnancy. Frisco: Elsevier Inc., 2022;392-4.

[Cited within: 1]

Ralph R, Faiz MA, Sharma SK, Ribeiro I, Chappuis F.

Managing snakebite

BMJ. 2022;376: e057926.

[Cited within: 2]

Pepin S, Lutsch C, Grandgeorge M, Scherrmann JM.

Snake F(ab’)2 antivenom from hyperimmunized horse: pharmacokinetics following intravenous and intramuscular administrations in rabbits

Pharm Res. 1995 ;12(10): 1470-3.

[Cited within: 1]

Gamulin E, Mateljak Lukačević S, Halassy B, Kurtović T.

Snake antivenoms-toward better understanding of the administration route

Toxins. 2023 ;15(6): 398.

[Cited within: 1]

Brown AE, Brown L.

Blood venom antigen levels after Malayan pit viper bite

Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987 ;81(4): 548.

[Cited within: 1]

Sriapha C, Rittilert P, Vasaruchapong T, Srisuma S, Wananukul W, Trakulsrichai S.

Early adverse reactions to snake antivenom: poison center data analysis

Toxins. 2022 ;14(10): 694.

[Cited within: 1]

Giles T, Čačala SR, Wood D, Klopper J, Oosthuizen GV.

A retrospective study of antivenom-associated adverse reaction and anaphylaxis at Ngwelezana Hospital, South Africa

Toxicon. 2022;217: 1-4.

[Cited within: 1]

Li QQ, Zeng LB, Deng HY, Liang Q.

Adverse reactions to four types of monovalent antivenom used in the treatment of snakebite envenoming in South China

Toxicon. 2022;219: 106935.

[Cited within: 1]

Morais V.

Antivenom therapy: efficacy of premedication for the prevention of adverse reactions

J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2018;24: 7.

[Cited within: 1]

Mender MM, Bolton F, Berry C, Young M.

Antivenom: an immunotherapy for the treatment of snakebite envenoming in sub-Saharan Africa

Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2022;129: 435-77.

[Cited within: 1]

Muraro A, Worm M, Alviani C, Cardona V, DunnGalvin A, Garvey LH, et al.

EAACI guidelines: Anaphylaxis (2021 update)

Allergy. 2022 ;77(2): 357-77.

[Cited within: 1]

Li XT, Ma QB, Yin J, Zheng YA, Chen RC, Chen YG, et al.

A clinical practice guideline for the emergency management of anaphylaxis (2020)

Front Pharmacol. 2022;13: 845689.

[Cited within: 1]

Hall EL.

Role of surgical intervention in the management of crotaline snake envenomation

Ann Emerg Med. 2001 ;37(2): 175-80.

[Cited within: 1]

Laohawiriyakamol S, Sangkhathat S, Chiengkriwate P, Patrapinyokul S.

Surgery in management of snake envenomation in children

World J Pediatr. 2011 ;7(4): 361-4.

[Cited within: 1]

Russell JJ, Schoenbrunner A, Janis JE.

Snake bite management: a scoping review of the literature

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 ; 9(4): e3506.

[Cited within: 1]

Mao YC, Liu PY, Chiang LC, Lee CH, Lai CS, Lai KL, et al.

Clinical manifestations and treatments of Protobothrops mucrosquamatus bite and associated factors for wound necrosis and subsequent debridement and finger or toe amputation surgery

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2021 ;59(1):28-37.

[Cited within: 1]

Toschlog EA, Bauer CR, Hall EL, Dart RC, Khatri V, Lavonas EJ.

Surgical considerations in the management of pit viper snake envenomation

J Am Coll Surg. 2013 ;217(4): 726-35.

[Cited within: 2]

Cumpston KL.

Is there a role for fasciotomy in Crotalinae envenomations in North America?

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2011 ;49(5):351-65.

[Cited within: 1]

Zhang HY, Guo Y, Huang XY, Li Y, Zhang LY.

An online survey of non-compressible torso hemorrhage: training is needed

World J Emerg Med. 2022 ;13(4):297-300.

[Cited within: 1]

Spyres MB, Maker G, Aldy K, Wolk BJ, Meadors KE, Christian M, et al.

Compartment syndrome after crotalid envenomation in the United States: a review of the North American snakebite registry from 2013 to 2021 on behalf of the Toxic snakebite study group

Wilderness Environ Med. 2023 ;34(3): 322-7.

[Cited within: 1]

Tanen DA, Danish DC, Grice GA, Riffenburgh RH, Clark RF.

Fasciotomy worsens the amount of myonecrosis in a porcine model of crotaline envenomation

Ann Emerg Med. 2004 ;44(2): 99-104.

[Cited within: 1]

Darracq MA, Cantrell FL, Klauk B, Thornton SL.

A chance to cut is not always a chance to cure- fasciotomy in the treatment of rattlesnake envenomation: a retrospective poison center study

Toxicon. 2015;101: 23-6.

[Cited within: 1]

Normandin S, Safran T, Winocour S, Chu CK, Vorstenbosch J, Murphy AM, et al.

Negative pressure wound therapy: mechanism of action and clinical applications

Semin Plast Surg. 2021 ;35(3):164-70.

[Cited within: 2]

Kim PJ, Attinger CE, Constantine T, Crist BD, Faust E, Hirche CR, et al.

Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation: international consensus guidelines update

Int Wound J. 2020 ;17(1): 174-86.

[Cited within: 1]

Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Consortium DFS.

Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Lancet. 2005 ;366(9498): 1704-10.

[Cited within: 1]

Huang Q, Wang JT, Gu HC, Cao G, Cao JC.

Comparison of vacuum sealing drainage and traditional therapy for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 ;58(5): 954-8.

[Cited within: 1]

Seidel D, Diedrich S, Herrle F, Thielemann H, Marusch F, Schirren R, et al.

Negative pressure wound therapy vs conventional wound treatment in subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment: the SAWHI randomized clinical trial

JAMA Surg. 2020 ;155(6): 469-78.

[Cited within: 1]

Cai LY, Mei YF, Chen CH, Wang JW, Wang XY, Zheng WH.

Comparison of vacuum sealing drainage and conventional drainage for postoperative drainage in closed calcaneal fracture: a randomized controlled trial

Injury. 2022 ;53(2): 777-83.

[Cited within: 1]

Duan HJ, He YQ, Zhang HB, Wang F, Chen S, Wang J.

Vacuum sealing drainage with instillation in the treatment of necrotising soft-tissue infection: a retrospective analysis

J Wound Care. 2020 ;29(9): 510-7.

[Cited within: 1]

Älgå A, Haweizy R, Bashaireh K, Wong S, Lundgren KC, von Schreeb J, et al.

Negative pressure wound therapy versus standard treatment in patients with acute conflict-related extremity wounds: a pragmatic, multisite, randomised controlled trial

Lancet Glob Health. 2020 ;8(3): e423-e429.

[Cited within: 1]

Costa ML, Achten J, Bruce J, Tutton E, Petrou S, Lamb SE, et al.

Effect of negative pressure wound therapy vs. standard wound management on 12-month disability among adults with severe open fracture of the lower limb: the WOLLF randomized clinical trial

JAMA. 2018 ;319(22): 2280-8.

[Cited within: 1]

Costa ML, Achten J, Knight R, Bruce J, Dutton SJ, Madan J, et al.

Effect of incisional negative pressure wound therapy vs. standard wound dressing on deep surgical site infection after surgery for lower limb fractures associated with major trauma: the WHIST randomized clinical trial

JAMA. 2020 ;323(6): 519-26.

[Cited within: 1]

Yuan KZ, Zhao B, Cooper T, Jin ZY, Zhou XJ, Chen XL, et al.

The management of degloving injuries of the limb with full thickness skin grafting using vacuum sealing drainage or traditional compression dressing: a comparative cohort study

J Orthop Sci. 2019 ;24(5): 881-7.

[Cited within: 1]

Kim KJ, Min JH, Yoo I, Kim SW, Lee J, Ryu S, et al.

Negative pressure wound therapy for skin necrosis prevention after snakebite in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study

Medicine. 2021 ;100(3): e24290.

[Cited within: 1]

Zeng FJ, Chen C, Chen XY, Zhang L, Liu MH.

Small incisions combined with negative-pressure wound therapy for treatment of Protobothrops mucrosquamatus bite envenomation: a new treatment strategy

Med Sci Monit. 2019;25: 4495-502.

[Cited within: 1]

Lu HY, Mao YC, Liu PY, Lai KL, Wu CY, Tsai YC, et al.

Clinical predictors of early surgical intervention in patients with venomous snakebites

Eur J Med Res. 2023 ;28(1): 131.

[Cited within: 1]

Liu LP, Long CP, Huang GZ.

Effect of fluctuating negative-pressure closed drainage technique on the therapeutic efficacy of Chinese cobra bite patients

China Med. 2021, 16(3):444-7.

[Cited within: 1]

Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Instructions for clinical use in the pharmacopoeia in China:chemical drugs and biological products. Beijing: China Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Press. 2017: 136-57.

[Cited within: 3]

Walls RM. Rosen's emergency medicine:concepts and clinical practice. Frisco: Elsevier Inc. 2023;698.

[Cited within: 1]

Lam KK, Crow P, Ng KHL, Shek KC, Fung HT, Ades G, et al.

A cross-sectional survey of snake oral bacterial flora from Hong Kong, SAR, China

Emerg Med J. 2011 ;28(2):107-14.

[Cited within: 1]

Shaikh IK, Dixit PP, Pawade BS, Potnis-Lele M, Kurhe BP.

Assessment of cultivable oral bacterial flora from important venomous snakes of India and their antibiotic susceptibilities

Curr Microbiol. 2017 ;74(11): 1278-86.

[Cited within: 1]

Smith LK, Vardanega J, Smith S, White J, Little M, Hanson J.

The incidence of infection complicating snakebites in tropical Australia: implications for clinical management and antimicrobial prophylaxis

J Trop Med. 2023;2023: 5812766.

[Cited within: 2]

Soares Coriolano Coutinho JV, Fraga Guimarães T, Borges Valente B, Gomes Martins de Moura Tomich L.

Epidemiology of secondary infection after snakebites in center-west Brazil

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 ;17(3): e0011167.

[Cited within: 1]

Bonilla-Aldana DK, Bonilla-Aldana JL, Ulloque-Badaracco JR, Al-Kassab-Córdova A, Hernandez-Bustamante EA, Alarcon-Braga EA, et al.

Snakebite-associated infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 ;110(5): 874-86.

[Cited within: 1]

Mao YC, Liu PY, Chiang LC, Lai CS, Lai KL, Ho CH, et al.

Naja atra snakebite in Taiwan, China

Clin Toxicol. 2018;56273-80.

[Cited within: 2]

Chuang PC, Lin WH, Chen YC, Chien CC, Chiu IM, Tsai TS.

Oral bacteria and their antibiotic susceptibilities in Taiwan, China venomous snakes

Microorganisms. 2022 ; 10(5):951.

[Cited within: 1]

Sachett JAG, da Silva IM, Alves EC, Oliveira SS, Sampaio VS, do Vale FF, et al.

Poor efficacy of preemptive amoxicillin clavulanate for preventing secondary infection from Bothrops snakebites in the Brazilian Amazon: a randomized controlled clinical trial

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 ;11(7): e0005745.

[Cited within: 1]

Lin CC, Chen YC, Goh ZNL, Seak CK, Seak JC, Gao SY, et al.

Wound infections of snakebites from the venomous Protobothrops mucrosquamatus and Viridovipera stejnegeri in Taiwan, China: bacteriology, antibiotic susceptibility, and predicting the need for antibiotics-a bite study

Toxins. 2020 ;12(9): 575.

[Cited within: 1]

Yeh H, Gao SY, Lin CC.

Wound infections from Taiwan, China cobra (Naja atra) bites: determining bacteriology, antibiotic susceptibility, and the use of antibiotics-a cobra BITE study

Toxins (Basel). 2021 ;13(3): 183.

[Cited within: 1]

Hu SP, Lou ZQ, Shen YC, Tu MY.

Bacteriological studies of venomous snakebite wounds in Hangzhou, southeast China

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 ;107(4): 925-9.

[Cited within: 1]

Habib AG.

Tetanus complicating snakebite in northern Nigeria: clinical presentation and public health implications

Acta Trop. 2003 ;85(1): 87-91.

[Cited within: 1]

Usman SA, Taslim LO, Uduak OM, Lily MT, Aliyu NM.

Childhood tetanus complicating snakebite: a case report from a semi-urban area, northwestern Nigeria

Cerrahpasa Med J. 2023 ;47(2): 239-40.

[Cited within: 1]

Vijaykumar G, Sreenivas K.

Rare case of tetanus from snakebite wound

Telangana J IMA. 2022 ;2(1): 40-1.

[Cited within: 1]

Ghosh M, Acharyya A, Bhattacharya P, Chakrabortty S.

Role of steroid on management of limb swelling and local pain in haematotoxic snake bite

J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 ;11(11): 7394-7.

[Cited within: 1]

Nuchprayoon I, Pongpan C, Sripaiboonkij N.

The role of prednisolone in reducing limb oedema in children bitten by green pit vipers: a randomized, controlled trial

Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2008 ;102(7): 643-9.

[Cited within: 1]

Irshad VS, Godhiwala P, Kumar S, Bagga CS, Gupta A.

Role of neostigmine in neurotoxic snake bite

Jemds. 2021 ;10(15): 1095-7.

[Cited within: 1]

Lewin MR, Bickler P, Heier T, Feiner J, Montauk L, Mensh B.

Reversal of experimental paralysis in a human by intranasal neostigmine aerosol suggests a novel approach to the early treatment of neurotoxic envenomation

Clin Case Rep. 2013 ;1(1): 7-15.

[Cited within: 1]

Giri S, Taye SJ, Shyam R, Saikia B, Jangid R, Yasmin R, et al.

Recurrent neurotoxity in Naja kaouthia envenomation: a case report from Assam, India

Toxicon. 2023;222: 106990.

[Cited within: 1]

Anil A, Singh S, Bhalla A, Sharma N, Agarwal R, Simpson ID.

Role of neostigmine and polyvalent antivenom in Indian common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) bite

J Infect Public Health. 2010 ;3(2): 83-7.

[Cited within: 1]

Isbister GK, Buckley NA, Page CB, Scorgie FE, Lincz LF, Seldon M, et al.

A randomized controlled trial of fresh frozen plasma for treating venom-induced consumption coagulopathy in cases of Australian snakebite (ASP-18)

J Thromb Haemost. 2013 ;11(7): 1310-8.

[Cited within: 1]

Holla SK, Rao HA, Shenoy D, Boloor A, Boyanagari M.

The role of fresh frozen plasma in reducing the volume of anti-snake venom in snakebite envenomation

Trop Doct. 2018 ;48(2): 89-93.

[Cited within: 1]

Isbister GK, Jayamanne S, Mohamed F, Dawson AH, Maduwage K, Gawarammana I, et al.

A randomized controlled trial of fresh frozen plasma for coagulopathy in Russell’s viper (Daboia russelii) envenoming

J Thromb Haemost. 2017 ;15(4): 645-54.

[Cited within: 1]

Zeng LB, Liang Q, Liang ZJ, Han JY, Wu MZ, Liu R, et al.

Effectiveness of clotting factor replacement therapy after antivenom treatment on coagulopathic envenomation following green pit viper bites: a retrospective observational study

BMC Emerg Med. 2022 ;22(1): 9.

[Cited within: 1]

Jeon YJ, Kim JW, Park S, Shin DW.

Risk factor, monitoring, and treatment for snakebite induced coagulopathy: a multicenter retrospective study

Acute Crit Care. 2020 ;35(1): 56.

[Cited within: 1]

de Queiroz MR, de Sousa BB, da Cunha Pereira DF, Mamede CCN, Matias MS, de Morais NCG, et al.

The role of platelets in hemostasis and the effects of snake venom toxins on platelet function

Toxicon. 2017;133: 33-47.

[Cited within: 1]

National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Standard operating procedures for blood purification (Version 2021). Available at http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7659/202111/6e25b8260b214c55886d6f0512c1e53f.shtml

URL     [Cited within: 1]

Noutsos T, Isbister GK.

Snakebite-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: a spotlight on pharmaceutical interventions

Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2023 ;16(6):559-74.

[Cited within: 1]

Noutsos T, Currie BJ, Lek RA, Isbister GK.

Snakebite-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: a systematic review of clinical features, outcomes, and evidence for interventions including plasmapheresis

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 ;14(12): e0008936.

[Cited within: 1]

Mohan G, Guduri PR, Shastry S.

Role of therapeutic plasma exchange in snake bite associated thrombotic microangiopathy-a case report with review of literature

J Clin Apher. 2019 ;34(4): 507-9.

[Cited within: 1]

Noutsos T, Currie BJ, Isoardi KZ, Brown SGA, Isbister GK.

Snakebite-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: an Australian prospective cohort study

Clin Toxicol, 2022, 60(2): 205-213.

[Cited within: 1]

Noutsos T, Currie BJ, Isoardi KZ, Brown SGA, Isbister GK.

Snakebite-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: an Australian prospective cohort study [ASP30]

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2022 ;60(2): 205-13.

[Cited within: 1]

Schwartz J, Winters JL, Padmanabhan A, Balogun RA, Delaney M, Linenberger ML, et al.

Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice-evidence-based approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: the sixth special issue

J Clin Apher. 2013 ;28(3): 145-284.

[Cited within: 1]

Chang KC, Huang YK, Chen YW, Chen MH, Tu AT, Chen YC.

Venom ophthalmia and ocular complications caused by snake venom

Toxins. 2020 ;12(9): 576.

[Cited within: 1]

Fung HT, Lam KK, Wong OF, Lam TS.

Local antivenom treatment for ophthalmic injuries caused by a Naja atra

J Med Toxicol. 2010 ;6(2): 147-9.

[Cited within: 1]

Yu WQ, Wang WC, Diao JC.

Clinical observation on 300 cases of pit viper bites treated with integrated therapy of Chinese medicine intervention

Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2011; 52 (12):1019-22.

[Cited within: 1]

Yu PA.

An overview of snakes in China

Snake Chi. 1999 ;5(12):46.

[Cited within: 1]

Wang WC, Yan ZR.

Expert consensus on Chinese medicine diagnostic and treatment protocol for venomous snake bites (2016 edition)

Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2017 ;58(4):357-60.

[Cited within: 1]

Shi WR.

A review of Fujian snakebite prescriptions

Fujian Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2023 ;54(2):36-69,42.

[Cited within: 1]

Huang N, Wu GC.

Progress in the treatment of venomous snake bites by traditional Chinese medicine

Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2010 ;12(12):54-6.

[Cited within: 1]

Cheng FP, Huang XB, Zhang Y.

Progress in the treatment of snakebite ulcers

China Modern Distance Education of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2016 ;14(6):143-5.

[Cited within: 1]

Xu XG, Wang Y, Xu YF.

Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of pit viper bites

Snake Chi. 2022 ;34(4):445-51.

[Cited within: 2]

Bhaumik S, Kallakuri S, Kaur A, Devarapalli S, Daniel M.

Mental health conditions after snakebite: a scoping review

BMJ Glob Health. 2020 ;5(11): e004131.

[Cited within: 1]

Waiddyanatha S, Silva A, Weerakoon K, Siribaddana S, Isbister GK.

Long-term health effects perceived by snakebite patients in rural Sri Lanka: a cohort study

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 ;16(9): e0010723.

[Cited within: 1]

Waiddyanatha S, Silva A, Siribaddana S, Isbister GK.

Long-term effects of snake envenoming

Toxins (Basel). 2019 ;11(4): 193.

[Cited within: 1]

North CS, Pfefferbaum B.

Mental health response to community disasters: a systematic review

JAMA. 2013 ;310(5): 507-18.

[Cited within: 1]

Wijesinghe CA, Williams SS, Kasturiratne A, Dolawaththa N, Wimalaratne P, Wijewickrema B, et al.

A randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention for delayed psychological effects in snakebite victims

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 ;9(8): e0003989.

[Cited within: 1]

Maercker A, Cloitre M, Bachem R, Schlumpf YR, Khoury B, Hitchcock C, et al.

Complex post-traumatic stress disorder

Lancet. 2022 ;400(10345): 60-72.

[Cited within: 1]

Ren MH, Malecela MN, Cooke E, Abela-Ridder B.

WHO’s snakebite envenoming strategy for prevention and control

Lancet Glob Health. 2019 ;7(7): e837-e838.

[Cited within: 2]

Iliyasu G, Tiamiyu AB, Daiyab FM, Tambuwal SH, Habib ZG, Habib AG.

Effect of distance and delay in access to care on outcome of snakebite in rural north-eastern Nigeria

Rural Remote Health. 2015 ;15(4): 3496.

/