Sign In    Register

World Journal of Emergency Medicine ›› 2014, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3): 214-217.doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2014.03.010

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Combined use of non-biological artificial liver treatments for patients with acute liver failure complicated by multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

Mao-qin Li(), Jun-xiang Ti, Yun-hang Zhu, Zai-xiang Shi, Ji-yuan Xu, Bo Lu, Jia-qiong Li, Xiao-meng Wang, Yan-jun Xu   

  1. Department of Intensive Care, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, Southeast University, Xuzhou 221009, China
  • Received:2014-01-11 Accepted:2014-07-03 Online:2014-09-15 Published:2014-09-15
  • Contact: Mao-qin Li E-mail:limaoqinxi@126.com

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Acute liver failure (ALF) caused by viral and non-viral hepatitis is often accompanied with severe metabolic disorders, the accumulation of toxic substances and continuous release and accumulation of a large number of endogenous toxins and inflammatory mediators. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of various combined non-biological artificial liver treatments for patients with acute liver failure (ALF) complicated by multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).
METHODS: Thirty-one patients with mid- or late-stage liver failure complicated by MODS (score 4) were randomly divided into three treatment groups: plasmapheresis (PE) combined with hemoperfusion (HP) and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), PE+CVVHDF, and HP+CVVHDF, respectively. Heart rate (HR) before and after treatment, mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory index (PaO2/FiO2), hepatic function, platelet count, and blood coagulation were determined.
RESULTS: Significant improvement was observed in HR, MAP, PaO2/FiO2, total bilirubin (TBIL) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels after treatment (P<0.05). TBIL and ALT decreased more significantly after treatment in the PE+CVVHDF and PE+HP+CVVHDF groups (P<0.01). Prothrombin time (PT) and albumin were significantly improved only in the PE+CVVHDF and PE+HP+CVVHDF groups (P<0.05). TBIL decreased more significantly in the PE+HP+CVVHDF group than in the HP+CVVHDF and PE+CVVHDF groups (P<0.05). The survival rate of the patients was 58.1% (18/31), viral survival rate 36.4% (4/11), and non-viral survival rate 70% (14/20).
CONCLUSION: Liver function was relatively improved after treatment, but PE+HP+CVVHDF was more efficient for the removal of toxic metabolites, especially bilirubin. The survival rate was significantly higher in the patients with non-viral liver failure than in those with viral liver failure.

Key words: Severe acute liver failure, Artificial liver, Plasma exchange, Hemoperfusion, Continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration