World Journal of Emergency Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2): 162-171.doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2026.035
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jinlan Ma1, Li Peng2, Hongming Yu3, Jianfeng Xie4, Ying Tang4, Shenglin Su3, Libing Ma1, Xiaojun Yang1(
)
Received:2025-07-17
Accepted:2025-12-02
Online:2026-03-17
Published:2026-03-01
Contact:
Xiaojun Yang, Email: yxjicu@163.comJinlan Ma, Li Peng, Hongming Yu, Jianfeng Xie, Ying Tang, Shenglin Su, Libing Ma, Xiaojun Yang. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals pathogen-specific monocyte heterogeneity and potential biomarkers in gram-positive versus gram-negative bloodstream infections[J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2026, 17(2): 162-171.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://wjem.com.cn/EN/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2026.035
Figure 1.
The overall research workflow. A: peripheral venous blood samples were collected from septic patients with GPC and GNB bloodstream infections (BSI), as well as healthy volunteers, followed by scRNA-seq. Differential genes were then identified using Venn diagram analysis. B: additional blood samples were collected from septic patients with GPC and GNB bloodstream infections for the comparison of clinical characteristics and biomarkers identification. GPC: gram-positive cocci; GNB: gram-negative bacilli; HC: healthy control; scRNA-seq: single-cell RNA sequencing.
Figure 2.
Changes in cell populations in sepsis caused by bloodstream infections (BSI) from different pathogens. A: bar plot of cluster distribution across different samples. In the left panel, the X-axis represents the percentage of cells from different samples within the same cluster, with different colors indicating different samples. The right panel shows the distribution of total cell counts across all samples within each cluster, with the Y-axis representing different clusters and the X-axis representing the total cell count within each cluster. B: bubble plot of top 5 marker genes. The X-axis represents gene names, and the Y-axis represents the corresponding cell types. C: cell type distribution chart. The X-axis represents different samples, and the Y-axis represents the percentage of corresponding cell counts. Different colors indicate different cell types. D: the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) plot of all cell types. Different colors represent different cell types. E: bar plot showing the distribution of subpopulations, with the X-axis representing different samples and the Y-axis indicating the percentage of corresponding cell numbers. Different colors represent different subpopulations. F: uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plot for cell subpopulation identification, with different colors indicating different monocyte subpopulations. Blood samples labeled A1/A2, B1/B2, C1/C2 corresponding to group A (GNB-BSI), group B (GPC-BSI), and group C (control group), respectively.
Table 1.
Comparison of clinical characteristics between the GNB-BSI and GPC-BSI groups
| Variables | GNB-BSI (n=45) | GPC-BSI (n=40) | χ²/t/Z | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male, n (%) | 18 (40) | 24 (60) | 3.389 | 0.066 |
| Age, years, mean±SD | 64.91±13.31 | 58.22±15.51 | 2.138 | 0.035 |
| Underlying diseases, n (%) | ||||
| Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases | 16 (35.6) | 7 (17.5) | 3.498 | 0.061 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 8 (17.8) | 11 (27.5) | 1.153 | 0.283 |
| Cancer | 5 (11.1) | 2 (5.0) | 0.394 | 0.530 |
| Infection sites, n (%) | ||||
| Skin and soft tissue | 0 (0) | 16 (40.0) | 22.174 | <0.001 |
| Abdominal cavity | 25 (55.6) | 7 (17.5) | 13.065 | <0.001 |
| Urinary tract | 16 (35.6) | 6 (15.0) | 4.664 | 0.031 |
| Lung | 4 (8.9) | 10 (25.0) | 3.995 | 0.046 |
| Others | 0 (0) | 1 (2.5) | 13.805 | <0.001 |
| APACHE Ⅱ score, median (IQR) | 15 (12.25-17.25) | 10 (8.5-11.5) | -6.870 | <0.001 |
| SOFA score, mean±SD | 12.43±1.62 | 5.83±1.56 | 19.095 | <0.001 |
| Mechanical ventilation time, h, mean±SD | 121.74±25.76 | 16.77±6.13 | 3.756 | <0.001 |
| Hospitalization duration, d, mean±SD | 15.49±2.30 | 13.05±1.97 | 0.795 | 0.429 |
| Total hospitalization costs, yuan, mean±SD | 84139.4±15166.9 | 45267.9±8015.5 | 2.186 | 0.032 |
| 28-day mortality, n (%) | 21 (46.7) | 9 (22.5) | 5.416 | 0.020 |
Table 2.
Comparison of laboratory parameters between the GNB-BSI and GPC-BSI groups
| Parameter | GNB-BSI (n=45) | GPC-BSI (n=40) | t/Z | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 6.30 (4.55-9.17) | 2.80 (1.18-4.42) | -4.935 | <0.001 |
| Total bilirubin (μmol/L) | 38.50 (20.65-99.50) | 19.90 (14.20-31.25) | -3.584 | <0.001 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 119.00 (88.55-228.92) | 83.60 (56.15-148.90) | -3.153 | 0.002 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 23.75 (21.07-24.85) | 32.30 (28.05-36.65) | -6.249 | <0.001 |
| Globulin (g/L) | 22.32±6.18 | 29.68±6.58 | -5.321 | <0.001 |
| Albumin/globulin | 1.00 (0.90-1.18) | 1.10 (0.90-1.40) | -1.265 | 0.206 |
| D-dimer (DDU) | 8.89 (5.67-20.28) | 2.82 (1.41-8.13) | -4.208 | <0.001 |
| Prothrombin activity (%) | 44.93±15.26 | 79.15±20.35 | -8.806 | <0.001 |
| Platelet counts (×109/L) | 33.00 (16.00-45.75) | 195.00 (154.50-250.00) | -7.516 | <0.001 |
| White blood cell counts (×109/L) | 13.41 (7.81-25.64) | 12.21 (7.199-18.38) | -1.086 | 0.277 |
| Neutrophil percentage (%) | 93.15 (88.15-94.27) | 88.20 (83.25-93.90) | -1.728 | 0.084 |
| Interleukin-6 (pg/mL) | 2350.00 (442.75-5000.00) | 167.00 (43.10-2452.00) | -3.452 | 0.001 |
| Procalcitonin (ng/mL) | 56.50 (32.50-100.00) | 6.10 (0.71-30.50) | -5.417 | <0.001 |
| Lymphocyte percentage (%) | 5.9 (2.6-10.0) | 3.4 (2.3-4.5) | 2.626 | 0.009 |
| [1] |
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8): 801-10.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 pmid: 26903338 |
| [2] |
Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020; 395(10219): 200-11.
doi: S0140-6736(19)32989-7 pmid: 31954465 |
| [3] | Sakr Y, Jaschinski U, Wittebole X, Szakmany T, Lipman J, Ñamendys-Silva SA, et al. Sepsis in intensive care unit patients: worldwide data from the intensive care over nations audit. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018; 5(12): ofy313. |
| [4] |
Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mellhammar L, Rose N, Cassini A, Rudd KE, Schlattmann P, et al. Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46(8): 1552-62.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06151-x pmid: 32572531 |
| [5] |
Timsit JF, Ruppé E, Barbier F, Tabah A, Bassetti M. Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: an expert statement. Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46(2): 266-84.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05950-6 |
| [6] |
Gu XY, Zhou F, Wang YM, Fan GH, Cao B. Respiratory viral sepsis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Eur Respir Rev. 2020; 29(157): 200038.
doi: 10.1183/16000617.0038-2020 |
| [7] | Ikuta K, Swetschinski LR, Aguilar G, Sharara F, Meštrović T, Gray A, et al. Global mortality associated with 33 bacterial pathogens in 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Lond Engl. 2023; 400: 2221-48. |
| [8] | Phua J, Ngerng W, See K, Tay C, Kiong T, Lim H, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative versus culture-positive severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2013; 17(5): R202. |
| [9] | Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Singer M, Martin-Loeches I, Machado FR, Marshall JC, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of infection among patients in intensive care units in 2017. JAMA. 2020; 323(15): 1478-87. |
| [10] |
Sweeney TE, Khatri P. Benchmarking sepsis gene expression diagnostics using public data. Crit Care Med. 2017; 45(1): 1-10.
pmid: 27681387 |
| [11] |
Sweeney TE, Perumal TM, Henao R, Nichols M, Howrylak JA, Choi AM, et al. A community approach to mortality prediction in sepsis via gene expression analysis. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1): 694.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03078-2 pmid: 29449546 |
| [12] |
Auffray C, Sieweke MH, Geissmann F. Blood monocytes: development, heterogeneity, and relationship with dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009; 27: 669-92.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132557 pmid: 19132917 |
| [13] |
Xu Y, Wang Y, Liang LL, Song N. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis to explore immune cell heterogeneity and novel biomarkers for the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma. Front Genet. 2022; 13: 975542.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.975542 |
| [14] |
Sun YF, Wu L, Zhong Y, Zhou KQ, Hou Y, Wang ZF, et al. Single-cell landscape of the ecosystem in early-relapse hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell. 2021; 184(2): 404-21.e16.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.041 pmid: 33357445 |
| [15] | Sun SN, Zhou Y, Fu X, Zheng YZ, Xie C, Qin GY, et al. A pilot study of the differentiated landscape of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from children with incomplete versus complete Kawasaki disease. World J Pediatr. 2024; 20(2):189-200. |
| [16] |
Li GL, Yang ZX, Yang C, Xie YC, Gong SC, Lv SY, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals cell-cell communication and potential biomarker in sepsis and septic shock patients. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024; 132: 111938.
doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.111938 |
| [17] |
Wen MY, Cai GX, Ye JK, Liu XQ, Ding HG, Zeng HK. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the alteration of peripheral blood mononuclear cells driven by sepsis. Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(4): 125.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.35 pmid: 32175418 |
| [18] |
Hong YC, Chen L, Sun J, Xing LF, Yang Y, Jin XH, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals heterogeneous neutrophils with prognostic values in sepsis. iScience. 2022; 25(11): 105301.
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105301 |
| [19] |
Wang T, Zhang XL, Liu ZG, Yao T, Zheng DY, Gan JW, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the sustained immune cell dysfunction in the pathogenesis of sepsis secondary to bacterial pneumonia. Genomics. 2021; 113(3): 1219-33.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.01.026 pmid: 33691144 |
| [20] |
Villani AC, Satija R, Reynolds G, Sarkizova S, Shekhar K, Fletcher J, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals new types of human blood dendritic cells, monocytes, and progenitors. Science. 2017; 356(6335): eaah4573.
doi: 10.1126/science.aah4573 |
| [21] | Marshall JC. Why have clinical trials in sepsis failed? Trends Mol Med. 2014; 20(4): 195-203. |
| [22] |
Martin-Loeches I, Singer M, Leone M. Sepsis: key insights, future directions, and immediate goals. A review and expert opinion. Intensive Care Med. 2024; 50(12): 2043-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07694-z pmid: 39531053 |
| [23] |
Du LZ. Early diagnosis and management of neonatal sepsis: a perspective. World J Pediatr. 2024; 20(4):303-6.
doi: 10.1007/s12519-024-00803-4 |
| [24] |
Shen Y, Leng L, Hu Y. Exploring core genes associated with sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome using single-cell sequencing technology. J Inflamm Res. 2025; 18:1815-38.
doi: 10.2147/JIR.S448900 pmid: 39935525 |
| [25] |
Coillard A, Segura E. In vivo differentiation of human monocytes. Front Immunol. 2019; 10: 1907.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01907 pmid: 31456804 |
| [26] |
Liu YC, Yao Y, Yu MM, Gao YL, Qi AL, Jiang TY, et al. Frequency and mortality of sepsis and septic shock in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2022; 22(1): 564.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07543-8 |
| [27] |
Baltas I, Stockdale T, Tausan M, Kashif A, Anwar J, Anvar J, et al. Long-term outcome and risk factors for late mortality in Gram-negative bacteraemia: a retrospective cohort study. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021; 25: 187-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.03.019 pmid: 33813029 |
| [28] |
Fink MP. Bench-to-bedside review: cytopathic hypoxia. Crit Care. 2002; 6(6): 491-9.
doi: 10.1186/cc1824 pmid: 12493070 |
| [29] |
Huang XC, Zhao L, Peng RY. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and mitochondria: an intimate connection. Biomolecules. 2022; 13(1): 50.
doi: 10.3390/biom13010050 |
| [30] |
Lee I, Hüttemann M. Energy crisis: the role of oxidative phosphorylation in acute inflammation and sepsis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014; 1842(9): 1579-86.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.05.031 pmid: 24905734 |
| [31] |
Póvoa P, Coelho L, Dal-Pizzol F, Ferrer R, Huttner A, Conway Morris A, et al. How to use biomarkers of infection or sepsis at the bedside: guide to clinicians. Intensive Care Med. 2023; 49(2): 142-53.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06956-y pmid: 36592205 |
| [32] |
Austermann J, Spiekermann C, Roth J. S 100 proteins in rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2018; 14(9): 528-41.
doi: 10.1038/s41584-018-0058-9 pmid: 30076385 |
| [33] | Sreejit G, Flynn MC, Patil M, Krishnamurthy P, Murphy AJ, Nagareddy PR. S 100 family proteins in inflammation and beyond. Adv Clin Chem. 2020; 98: 173-231. |
| [34] |
Goyette J, Geczy CL. Inflammation-associated S100 proteins: new mechanisms that regulate function. Amino Acids. 2011; 41(4): 821-42.
doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0528-0 pmid: 20213444 |
| [35] |
Xia PP, Ji XD, Yan L, Lian SQ, Chen ZY, Luo Y. Roles of S100A8, S100A9 and S100A12 in infection, inflammation and immunity. Immunology. 2024; 171(3): 365-76.
doi: 10.1111/imm.13722 pmid: 38013255 |
| [36] |
Dubois C, Marcé D, Faivre V, Lukaszewicz AC, Junot C, Fenaille F, et al. High plasma level of S100A8/S100A9 and S100A12 at admission indicates a higher risk of death in septic shock patients. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1): 15660.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52184-8 pmid: 31666644 |
| [37] |
Fan JJ, Shi SS, Qiu YX, Liu MN, Shu Q. Analysis of signature genes and association with immune cells infiltration in pediatric septic shock. Front Immunol. 2022; 13: 1056750.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1056750 |
| [38] |
Foell D, Wittkowski H, Kessel C, Lüken A, Weinhage T, Varga G, et al. Proinflammatory S100A12 can activate human monocytes via Toll-like receptor 4. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013; 187(12): 1324-34.
doi: 10.1164/rccm.201209-1602OC |
| [39] |
Huoshen WD, Zhu HF, Xiong JK, Chen XY, Mou YJ, Hou SH, et al. Identification of potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for periodontitis. Int Dent J. 2025; 75(2): 1370-83.
doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.10.006 |
| [40] | Wang Y, Luu LDW, Liu S, Zhu X, Huang SY, Li F, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals a systemic immune dysregulation in COVID-19-associated pediatric encephalopathy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023; 8: 398. |
| [41] |
Xie J, Luo CJ, Mo BH, Lin YH, Liu GQ, Wang XT, et al. Inflammation and oxidative stress role of S100A12 as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker in acute myocardial infarction. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022; 2022: 2633123.
doi: 10.1155/omcl.v2022.1 |
| [42] |
Yao ZP, Zhang BH, Niu GC, Yan ZG, Tong XQ, Zou YH, et al. Neutrophil infiltration characterized by upregulation of S100A8, S100A9, S100A12 and CXCR2 is associated with the co-occurrence of Crohn’s disease and peripheral artery disease. Front Immunol. 2022; 13: 896645.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.896645 |
| [43] |
Tang AL, Shi Y, Dong QQ, Wang SH, Ge Y, Wang CY, et al. Prognostic differences in sepsis caused by gram-negative bacteria and gram-positive bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2023; 27(1): 467.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04750-w |
| [44] | Yao RQ, Zhao PY, Li ZX, Liu YY, Zheng LY, Duan Y, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of sepsis identifies HLA-DRlowS100Ahigh monocytes with immunosuppressive function. Mil Med Res. 2023; 10(1): 27. |
| [1] | Hui Chen, Yuanhua Lu, Songjie Bai, Yang Li, Tao Wang, Long Cai, Xinyi Yang, Yang Fang, Jianguo Wan, Yaqun Tang, Wenqiang Tao, Meiling Huang, Wei Zhong, Fen Liu, Kejian Qian. Stress-hyperglycemia ratio and glycemic variability predict severity and mortality in sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2026, 17(3): 250-257. |
| [2] | Zengzheng Ge, Xin Lu, Shiyuan Yu, Mubing Qin, Chao Gong, Qun Xu, Yanxia Gao, Joseph Harold Walline, Huadong Zhu, Yi Li. Diagnostic value of mismatch-negativity and P3a event-related potentials for sepsis-associated encephalopathy in non-sedated patients: a pilot study [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2026, 17(2): 172-178. |
| [3] | Yi Yao, Wenjin Li, Dejiang Hong, Ze Chen, Kai Peng, Guangju Zhao. Prediction model for quality of life in sepsis survivors one year after discharge [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2026, 17(2): 105-112. |
| [4] | Xin Lu, Mubing Qin, Zengrui Song, Ying Chen, Huadong Zhu, Yanxia Gao, Yi Li. Normal initial lactate level in sepsis patients: is lactate still useful for prognosis prediction? [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2026, 17(1): 57-64. |
| [5] | Yuhui Pan, Yanyan Ma, Ke Wan, Yizhou Xu, Guoxing Wang, Miaorong Xie. Endothelial cell injury: a crucial link in microcirculatory dysfunction associated with sepsis [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2026, 17(1): 28-35. |
| [6] | Wei Gu, Jie Zhong, Chuanzhu Lyu, Guoqiang Zhang, Miaorong Xie, Yuefeng Ma, Wei Guo. An approach for the emergency diagnosis and treatment of sepsis-associated encephalopathy in elderly individuals: a literature review [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2025, 16(5): 415-422. |
| [7] | Zesheng Wu, Fanghui Chen, Chen Xiao, Xue Zhao, Yuansheng Xu, Jinyan Fang, Yinyan Shao. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes and risk factors in adult sepsis survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2025, 16(5): 423-430. |
| [8] | Qiaosheng Wang, Qiong Luo, Zhiwei Su, Yan Xu, Liangshan Peng, Yin Wen, Hongke Zeng, Hongguang Ding. Activation of the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor mitigates cognitive deficits in mice with sepsis-associated encephalopathy by inhibiting microglial pyroptosis [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2025, 16(5): 438-446. |
| [9] | Sen Jiang, Xiandong Liu, Tong Liu, Yi Gu, Bo An, Chunxue Wang, Dongyang Zhao, Haitao Zhang, Lunxian Tang. Performance of a novel medical artificial intelligence large language model on supporting decision-making for emergency patients with suspected sepsis [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2025, 16(5): 447-455. |
| [10] | Quan Li, Yun Qu, Jinfang Xue, Hai Kang, Chuanzhu Lyu. Exploring lipid-modifying therapies for sepsis through the modulation of circulating inflammatory cytokines: a Mendelian randomization study [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2025, 16(3): 256-261. |
| [11] | Peili Chen, Yan Ge, Huiqiu Sheng, Wenwu Sun, Jiahui Wang, Li Ma, Enqiang Mao. The role of early changes in routine coagulation tests in predicting the occurrence and prognosis of sepsis [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2025, 16(2): 136-143. |
| [12] | Chunxue Wang, Dianyin Yang, Yuxin Zhu, Qian Yang, Tong Liu, Xiandong Liu, Dongyang Zhao, Xiaowei Bao, Tiancao Dong, Li Shao, Lunxian Tang. Circulating circular RNAs act as potential novel biomarkers for sepsis secondary to pneumonia: a prospective cohort study [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2025, 16(2): 144-152. |
| [13] | Azzah S Alharbi, Raghad Hassan Sanyi, Esam I Azhar. Bacteria and host: what does this mean for sepsis bottleneck? [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2025, 16(1): 10-17. |
| [14] | Tianpeng Hu, Yan Li, Shengtao Yan, Lichao Sun, Rui Lian, Jieqiong Yu, Jie Chen, Xiaoyu Liu, Guoqiang Zhang. Application of myxovirus resistance protein A in the etiological diagnosis of infections in adults [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2025, 16(1): 35-42. |
| [15] | Chao Gong, Shengyong Xu, Youlong Pan, Shigong Guo, Joseph Harold Walline, Xue Wang, Xin Lu, Shiyuan Yu, Mubing Qin, Huadong Zhu, Yanxia Gao, Yi Li. Effects of probiotic treatment on the prognosis of patients with sepsis: a systematic review [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2025, 16(1): 18-27. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
