Sign In    Register

World Journal of Emergency Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6): 552-558.doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.104

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Emergency at altitude: exploring physicians’ knowledge, preparedness, and perspectives on in-flight medical emergencies in Saudi Arabia Open Access

Abdulmajeed Almadhyan1, Dhai Almuteri2(), Sadeem Alsenidi3, Mohammed Alazmi4, Raghad Rajab5, Sarah Alghamdi6, Samah Alkuraydis7   

  1. 1Department of Emergency, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia
    2Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Unaizah 51911, Saudi Arabia
    3Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia
    4College of Medicine, Al Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
    5College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah 22384, Saudi Arabia
    6Faculty of Medicine, Al-Baha University, Al-Baha 65779, Saudi Arabia
    7Department of Emergency, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Qassim Health Cluster, Buraydah 52366, Saudi Arabia
  • Received:2025-01-09 Accepted:2025-05-21 Online:2025-11-13 Published:2025-11-01
  • Contact: Dhai Almuteri, Email: d.almuteri@qu.edu.sa

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: In-flight medical emergencies (IMEs) present significant challenges to healthcare professionals, particularly those with limited training or experience in managing such situations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the level of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of licensed doctors in Saudi Arabia concerning IMEs, and to identify the demographic factors influencing their preparedness.

METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 383 licensed physicians across five regions of Saudi Arabia. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire assessing demographics, knowledge of IMEs, attitudes towards providing assistance, and previous experience with in-flight emergencies. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26, with statistical significance set at P<0.05.

RESULTS: The results revealed a predominantly young (75.8% aged 25-34 years) and male (69.6%) participant pool. While 76.6% of respondents recognized the impact of cabin pressure on oxygen, only 45.4% correctly identified air travel risks for asthmatic patients. Although 66.8% felt confident assisting in IMEs, 20.9% cited medicolegal concerns. Moreover, area of working within Saudi Arabia (P=0.020), year of experience (P=0.041), prior experience with IMEs (P=0.021), and IMEs training (P<0.001) had a significant association with levels of knowledge.

CONCLUSION: The study highlights a critical need for enhanced training programs with a focus on the management of IMEs among healthcare practitioners in Saudi Arabia.

Key words: In-flight medical emergencies, Physicians’ knowledge, Attitudes, Confidence, Saudi Arabia, Medicolegal concerns